Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Plant Protection Products Drift Using an Integrated Chemical–Physical Approach

Author:

Becce Lorenzo1ORCID,Mazzi Giovanna2ORCID,Ali Ayesha3ORCID,Bortolini Mara2ORCID,Gregoris Elena24ORCID,Feltracco Matteo2ORCID,Barbaro Elena24,Contini Daniele5ORCID,Mazzetto Fabrizio136ORCID,Gambaro Andrea2

Affiliation:

1. Competence Centre for Plant Health, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (unibz), Piazza Università 1, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

2. Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy

3. Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental, Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (unibz), Piazza Università 1, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

4. Institute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council (CNR-ISP), Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy

5. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council (ISAC-CNR), Str. Prv. Lecce-Monteroni km 1.2, 73100 Lecce, Italy

6. Competence Centre for Mountain Innovation Ecosystems, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (unibz), Piazza Università 1, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

Abstract

The use of plant protection products (PPPs) has become fundamental to guarantee excellent field productivity. Nevertheless, their usage presents critical issues, such as the quantity of substances used, the relative toxicity, and the contamination of nearby fields caused by atmospheric drift. This study focuses on the characterization of aerosol droplets of PPPs produced by spraying a chemical marker, fluorescein, with an orchard airblast sprayer equipped with conventional hollow cone (HC) and anti-drift air inclusion (AI) nozzles, using a wind tunnel as a controlled environment. A particle/droplet image analysis was employed to study the droplet production of the nozzles, while a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) analysis allowed us to evaluate samples collected using a cascade impactor located at 5 m, 10 m, and 20 m from the emission point. Overall, HC nozzles are very accurate at producing specific drop size distributions (DSDs), while AI nozzles produce a much wider DSD, concentrating the largest part of the distributed volume into droplets of a larger size. The marker concentration was much lower for the AI nozzles compared to the HC nozzles; moreover, the two nozzles show a similar trend in the coarse droplet range, while significantly differing in the fine droplet spectrum.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3