Integrated Analysis of Methane Cycles and Trends at the WMO/GAW Station of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy)
-
Published:2024-08-07
Issue:8
Volume:15
Page:946
-
ISSN:2073-4433
-
Container-title:Atmosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmosphere
Author:
D’Amico Francesco12ORCID, Ammoscato Ivano1, Gullì Daniel1ORCID, Avolio Elenio1ORCID, Lo Feudo Teresa1ORCID, De Pino Mariafrancesca1, Cristofanelli Paolo3ORCID, Malacaria Luana1ORCID, Parise Domenico1, Sinopoli Salvatore1, De Benedetto Giorgia1ORCID, Calidonna Claudia Roberta1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council of Italy, Area Industriale Comp. 15, I-88046 Lamezia Terme, Catanzaro, Italy 2. Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Calabria, Via Bucci Cubo 15B, I-87036 Rende, Cosenza, Italy 3. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council of Italy, Via P. Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
Abstract
Due to its high short-term global warming potential (GWP) compared to carbon dioxide, methane (CH4) is a considerable agent of climate change. This research is aimed at analyzing data on methane gathered at the GAW (Global Atmosphere Watch) station of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy) spanning seven years of continuous measurements (2016–2022) and integrating the results with key meteorological data. Compared to previous studies on detected methane mole fractions at the same station, daily-to-yearly patterns have become more prominent thanks to the analysis of a much larger dataset. Overall, the yearly increase of methane at the Lamezia Terme station is in general agreement with global measurements by NOAA, though local peaks are present, and an increase linked to COVID-19 is identified. Seasonal changes and trends have proved to be fully cyclic, with the daily cycles being largely driven by local wind circulation patterns and synoptic features. Outbreak events have been statistically evaluated depending on their weekday of occurrence to test possible correlations with anthropogenic activities. A cross analysis between methane peaks and specific wind directions has also proved that local sources may be deemed responsible for the highest mole fractions.
Reference66 articles.
1. Methane’s Solar Radiative Forcing;Byrom;Geophys. Res. Lett.,2022 2. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.F., Lee, D., and Mendoza, B. (2013). Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 3. A multi-model assessment of the Global Warming Potential of hydrogen;Sand;Nat. Commun.,2023 4. Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: Evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability;Etheridge;J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.,1998 5. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement;Nisbet;Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles,2019
|
|