Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
Abstract
Spinal metastasis is exceedingly common in patients with cancer and its prevalence is expected to increase. Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastasis is indicated for pain relief, preservation or restoration of neurologic function, and mechanical stability. The overall prognosis is a major driver of treatment decisions; however, clinicians’ ability to accurately predict survival is limited. In this narrative review, we first discuss the NOMS decision framework used to guide decision making in the treatment of patients with spinal metastasis. Given that decision making hinges on prognosis, multiple scoring systems have been developed over the last three decades to predict survival in patients with spinal metastasis; these systems have largely been developed using expert opinions or regression modeling. Although these tools have provided significant advances in our ability to predict prognosis, their utility is limited by the relative lack of patient-specific survival probability. Machine learning models have been developed in recent years to close this gap. Employing a greater number of features compared to models developed with conventional statistics, machine learning algorithms have been reported to predict 30-day, 6-week, 90-day, and 1-year mortality in spinal metastatic disease with excellent discrimination. These models are well calibrated and have been externally validated with domestic and international independent cohorts. Despite hypothesized and realized limitations, the role of machine learning methodology in predicting outcomes in spinal metastatic disease is likely to grow.
Reference64 articles.
1. Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease: A review;Sciubba;J. Neurosurg. Spine,2010
2. Integrating evidence-based medicine for treatment of spinal metastases into a decision framework: Neurologic, oncologic, mechanical stability, and systemic disease;Barzilai;J. Clin. Oncol.,2017
3. A prospective evaluation of two radiotherapy schedules with 10 versus 20 fractions for the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression: Final results of a multicenter study;Rades;Cancer,2004
4. Radiotherapy for patients with metastases to the spinal column: A review of 603 patients at Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital;Mizumoto;Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.,2011
5. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease: What are the options, indications, and outcomes?;Gerszten;Spine,2009