Affiliation:
1. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Objectives: Surveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) is mainly directed by one-size-fits-all approaches instead of personalized decision making, even though treatment strategies and often endografts themselves are tailor-made to adjust for individual patients. We propose a modular imaging algorithm that escalates surveillance imaging based on invasiveness and need. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study of single-center data, results of a modular imaging algorithm were analyzed. The algorithm is characterized by initiating the examination with standard B-mode then transitioning to Duplex ultrasound, B-Flow, and CEUS. Additional CT(A) studies are conducted where required. The study population included both patients receiving EVAR or FEVAR. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding endoleak detection. Results: The study population included 28 patients receiving EVAR and 40 patients receiving FEVAR. They accounted for 101 follow-up visits, which led to 431 distinct imaging studies. CEUS has the highest endoleak detection rate, followed by CTA and B-Flow. Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow resulted in 0 and 1 false positive cases, respectively, considering CEUS the reference standard. In a select group of six patients, CEUS was omitted after endoleaks were displayed by Duplex ultrasound or B-Flow, leading to a successful type II coiling and no aneurysm-related adverse events. Conclusions: The proposed modular algorithm showed great potential to incorporate principles of personalized medicine in surveillance after endovascular aortic treatment. Since Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow rarely cause false positive endoleaks, more resource-intensive and invasive imaging studies such as CEUS and CTA can be omitted after positive identification.
Reference39 articles.
1. A 35 Year History of Stent Grafting, and How EVAR Conquered the World;Ivancev;Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.,2020
2. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review;Kim;Korean J. Radiol.,2019
3. Comparison of the Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair and Open Surgical Repair in the Treatment of Unruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review;AlOthman;Cureus,2020
4. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms;Wanhainen;Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.,2019
5. The role of fEVAR, chEVAR and open repair in treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms: A systematic review;J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino),2020