Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments
-
Published:2024-08-06
Issue:16
Volume:14
Page:1708
-
ISSN:2075-4418
-
Container-title:Diagnostics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diagnostics
Author:
David Emanuele12, Grazhdani Hektor3, Aliotta Lorenzo1ORCID, Gavazzi Livio Maria1ORCID, Foti Pietro Valerio1ORCID, Palmucci Stefano1ORCID, Inì Corrado1ORCID, Tiralongo Francesco1ORCID, Castiglione Davide1ORCID, Renda Maurizio4, Pacini Patrizia4, Di Bella Chiara4, Solito Carmen4ORCID, Gigli Silvia5, Fazio Alessandro1, Bella Rita1ORCID, Basile Antonio1, Cantisani Vito4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, University Hospital Policlinic “G. Rodolico-San Marco”, 95125 Catania, Italy 2. Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy 3. Klinika Dani, ENI nr 13, 1010 Tiranë, Albania 4. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy 5. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157 Rome, Italy
Abstract
Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries is a crucial risk factor in predicting the likelihood of future stroke events. In addition, emerging studies suggest that carotid stenosis may also be an indicator of plaque load on coronary arteries and thus have a correlation with the risk of acute cardiovascular events. Furthermore, although in symptomatic patients the degree of stenosis is the main morphological parameter studied, recent evidence suggests, especially in asymptomatic patients, that plaque vulnerability should also be evaluated as an emerging and significant imaging parameter. The reference diagnostic methods for the evaluation of carotid stenosis are currently ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography angiography (CTA). In addition, other more invasive methods such as 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and PET-CT, as well as digital subtraction angiography, can be used. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and there is often some confusion in their use. For example, the usefulness of MRI is often underestimated. In addition, implementations for each method have been developed over the years and are already enabling a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of our study is to make an in-depth analysis of all the methods in use and in particular their role in the diagnostic procedure of carotid stenosis, also discussing new technologies.
Reference72 articles.
1. A narrative review of the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke in carotid plaques: A distinction versus a compromise between hemodynamic and embolic mechanism;Mechtouff;Ann. Transl. Med.,2021 2. Advanced MRI for carotid plaque imaging;Singh;Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging.,2016 3. CT imaging features of carotid artery plaque vulnerability;Murgia;Ann. Transl. Med.,2020 4. Goudot, G., Khider, L., Pedreira, O., Poree, J., Julia, P., Alsac, J.M., Amemiya, K., Bruneval, P., Messas, E., and Pernot, M. (2020). Innovative Multiparametric Characterization of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability by Ultrasound. Front. Physiol., 11. 5. Multiparametric ultrasound evaluation of a case of bilateral carotid body tumor;Pacini;J. Ultrasound.,2021
|
|