Real-Life Diagnostic Performance of the Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Guidelines: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Author:

Freund Ophir12ORCID,Hadad Yitzhac3,Shalmon Tamar3,Wand Ori4,Schneer Sonia5,Perluk Tal Moshe2,Kleinhendler Eyal2,Hershko Tzlil12,Tiran Boaz2,Aviram Galit3,Gershman Evgeni2,Adir Yochai5,Shitrit David6,Bar-Shai Amir2,Unterman Avraham12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel

2. Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel

3. Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel

4. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Barzilai University Medical Center, Ashkelon 7830604, Israel

5. Pulmonary Division, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel

6. Pulmonary Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 4428164, Israel

Abstract

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) that may be difficult to confidently diagnose. Recently, the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT HP diagnostic guidelines were published, yet data validating their performance in real-life settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the HP guidelines compared to the gold-standard multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). For this purpose, we included consecutive ILD patients that underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy between 2017 and 2020 in three large medical centers. Four diagnostic factors (antigen exposure history, chest computed tomography pattern, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, and histology results) were used to assign guidelines-based HP diagnostic confidence levels for each patient. A sensitivity analysis was performed, with MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Overall, 213 ILD patients were included, 45 (21%) with an MDD diagnosis of HP. The guidelines’ moderate (≥70%) confidence threshold produced optimal performance with 73% sensitivity for HP, 89% specificity, and a J-index of 0.62. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a correct guidelines-based diagnosis was 0.86. The guidelines had better performance for non-fibrotic than fibrotic HP (AUC 0.92 vs. 0.82). All diagnostic factors, except bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, were independent predictors for MDD diagnosis of HP in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the HP guidelines exhibited a good diagnostic performance compared to MDD diagnosis in real-life setting.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3