Description of Peripheral Blood Perfusion by Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis (LASCA) in ‘Early’ versus ‘Clinically Overt’ Systemic Sclerosis in Routine Clinics

Author:

Willems Seppe1,Smith Vanessa123,Wallaert Steven4,Gotelli Emanuele5ORCID,Du Four Tessa12,Wyckstandt Kaat12,Cere Andrea5ORCID,Cutolo Maurizio5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

3. Unit for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Inflammation Research Center (IRC), Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), 9000 Ghent, Belgium

4. Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

5. Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, University of Genova, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy

Abstract

Objective: To investigate in an unselected, systemic sclerosis (SSc) cohort if baseline laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) peripheral blood perfusion (PBP) measurements differ between ‘early’ SSc (without skin involvement, or ‘limited’ SSc—LSSc) and ‘clinically overt’ SSc (with skin involvement, limited cutaneous SSc—LcSSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc—DcSSc) in routine setting. Methods: A group of twenty consecutive ‘early’ SSc patients and forty consecutive ‘clinically overt’ SSc patients (twenty LcSSc and twenty DcSSc) underwent clinical and LASCA examinations (to assess the peripheral blood perfusion [PBP] of both hands volar). Results: No statistically significant difference in adjusted PBP was found in the ‘early’ versus the ‘clinically overt’ group (p = 0.77) when adjusted for possible confounding factors (e.g., vasoactive medication, active smoking, history of DTL and disease duration). A wide variability was noted when observing the individual datapoints of each subset. Conclusion: This study with an unselected SSc population in daily routine, non-research setting, showed there was no difference in adjusted PBP at baseline between ‘early’ SSc and ‘clinically overt’ SSc when corrected for possible confounding factors. Interestingly a wide variation of individual datapoints were observed in each subset, which emphasizes the heterogeneity of SSc.

Funder

Research Foundation—Flanders (Belgium)

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference31 articles.

1. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): Classification, subsets and pathogenesis;Leroy;J. Rheumatol.,1988

2. Systemic sclerosis;Volkmann;Lancet,2023

3. Sequential dermal microvascular and perivascular changes in the development of scleroderma;Prescott;J. Pathol.,1992

4. Avvedimento and TK;Scleroderma Aust. J. Politics History,2009

5. Assessing microvascular changes in systemic sclerosis diagnosis and management;Cutolo;Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.,2010

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Laboratory Assessment of Raynaud’s Phenomenon;Raynaud’s Phenomenon;2024

2. Nailfold Capillaroscopy;Raynaud’s Phenomenon;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3