The Efficacy and Safety of Tandem Transplant Versus Single Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Chen Yu-Han1ORCID,Fogel Lindsay2,Sun Andrea Yue-En3,Yang Chieh4ORCID,Patel Rushin5,Chang Wei-Cheng6ORCID,Chen Po-Huang7ORCID,Jhou Hong-Jie8ORCID,Chen Yeu-Chin9,Dai Ming-Shen9,Lee Cho-Hao9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ 07631, USA

2. Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA

3. College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

4. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Community Hospital of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA 92411, USA

6. Department of Ophthalmology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan

7. Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan

8. Department of Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan

9. Division of Hematology and Oncology Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan

Abstract

While high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remain integral to the primary treatment of newly diagnosed transplant-elble multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the challenge of disease progression persists. The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tandem ASCT compared to single ASCT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing tandem ASCT with single ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases for studies published up to January 2024. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Twelve studies involving 5057 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tandem ASCT was associated with a significantly higher CRR compared to single ASCT (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03–1.71, I2 = 15%), but no significant differences were observed in PFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42–1.34, I2 = 14%), OS (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.33–1.10, I2 = 27%), or the ORR (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59–1.08, I2 = 33%). However, tandem ASCT was associated with a significantly higher risk of TRM (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.00–3.18, I2 = 0%). Tandem ASCT improves the CRR but does not provide significant benefits in terms of PFS, OS, or ORR compared to single ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Moreover, tandem ASCT is associated with a higher risk of TRM. The decision to pursue tandem ASCT should be made on an individual basis, carefully weighing the potential benefits and risks in light of each patient’s unique clinical situation. Future research should focus on identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit from tandem ASCT and exploring strategies to optimize the efficacy and safety of this approach in the context of novel agent-based therapies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. (2024, May 12). National Comprehensive Cancer Network Multiple Myeloma, Version 1. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1.

2. Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma A Review;Cowan;JAMA,2022

3. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma;Child;N. Engl. J. Med.,2003

4. Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma;Bazarbachi;Blood Cancer J.,2019

5. Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: Recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group;Laubach;Leukemia,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3