Diagnostic Efficacy of Carotid Ultrasound for Predicting the Risk of Perioperative Hypotension or Fluid Responsiveness: A Meta-Analysis

Author:

Hung Kuo-Chuan12ORCID,Huang Yen-Ta3ORCID,Tsai Wen-Wen4,Tan Ping-Heng12,Wu Jheng-Yan5ORCID,Huang Po-Yu6,Liu Ting-Hui7ORCID,Chen I-Wen8ORCID,Sun Cheuk-Kwan910

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City 80424, Taiwan

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan

3. Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan

4. Department of Neurology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan

5. Department of Nutrition, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan

7. Department of General Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan

8. Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan City 73657, Taiwan

9. Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan

10. School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan

Abstract

Despite the acceptance of carotid ultrasound for predicting patients’ fluid responsiveness in critical care and anesthesia, its efficacy for predicting hypotension and fluid responsiveness remains unclear in the perioperative setting. Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2023 to identify observational studies focusing on the use of corrected blood flow time (FTc) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak) for assessing the risks of hypotension and fluid responsiveness. Using FTc as a predictive tool (four studies), the analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.89) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.97) for the risk of hypotension (area under curve (AUC): 0.95). For fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity and specificity of FTc were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.84) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.86), respectively (AUC: 0.87). In contrast, the use of ΔVpeak to predict the risk of fluid responsiveness showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.8) (AUC: 0.79). The current meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the high diagnostic accuracy of FTc in predicting perioperative hypotension and fluid responsiveness, which requires further studies for verification.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3