Periodic Leg Movements during Sleep Associated with REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Machine Learning Study

Author:

Salsone Maria12,Vescio Basilio34,Quattrone Andrea5,Marelli Sara2ORCID,Castelnuovo Alessandra6,Casoni Francesca2ORCID,Quattrone Aldo7,Ferini-Strambi Luigi26

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, 20054 Segrate, Italy

2. Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy

3. Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

4. Biotecnomed S.C.aR.L., c/o Magna Graecia University, G Building, lev.1, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

5. Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

6. Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy

7. Neuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

Abstract

Most patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) present peculiar repetitive leg jerks during sleep in their clinical spectrum, called periodic leg movements (PLMS). The clinical differentiation of iRBD patients with and without PLMS is challenging, without polysomnographic confirmation. The aim of this study is to develop a new Machine Learning (ML) approach to distinguish between iRBD phenotypes. Heart rate variability (HRV) data were acquired from forty-two consecutive iRBD patients (23 with PLMS and 19 without PLMS). All participants underwent video-polysomnography to confirm the clinical diagnosis. ML models based on Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were trained on HRV data, and classification performances were assessed using Leave-One-Out cross-validation. No significant clinical differences emerged between the two groups. The RF model showed the best performance in differentiating between iRBD phenotypes with excellent accuracy (86%), sensitivity (96%), and specificity (74%); SVM and XGBoost had good accuracy (81% and 78%, respectively), sensitivity (83% for both), and specificity (79% and 72%, respectively). In contrast, LR had low performances (accuracy 71%). Our results demonstrate that ML algorithms accurately differentiate iRBD patients from those without PLMS, encouraging the use of Artificial Intelligence to support the diagnosis of clinically indistinguishable iRBD phenotypes.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3