“Redo” 2D–3D Fusion Technique during Endovascular Redo Aortic Repair

Author:

Minelli Fabrizio1ORCID,Sica Simona1ORCID,Salman Fadia1,Donato Federica1ORCID,Dvir May2,Tshomba Yamume1ORCID,Tinelli Giovanni1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Roma—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy

2. School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aims to describe a new 2D–3D fusion registration method in the case of endovascular redo aortic repair and compare the accuracy of the registration using the previously implanted devices vs. bones as landmarks. Materials and Methods: This single-center study prospectively analyzed all the patients that underwent elective endovascular re-interventions using the Redo Fusion technique between January 2016 and December 2021 at the Vascular Surgery Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli (FPUG)—IRCCS in Rome, Italy. The fusion overlay was performed twice, first using bone landmarks (bone fusion) and the second using radiopaque markers of a previous endovascular device (redo fusion). The pre-operative 3D model was fused with live fluoroscopy to create a roadmap. Longitudinal distances between the inferior margin of the target vessel in live fluoroscopy and the inferior margin of the target vessel in bone fusion and redo fusion were measured. Results: This single-center study prospectively analyzed 20 patients. There were 15 men and five women, with a median age of 69.7 (IQR 42) years. The median distance between the inferior margin of the target vessel ostium in digital subtraction angiography and the inferior margin of the target vessel ostium in bone fusion and redo fusion was 5.35 mm and 1.35 mm, respectively (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions: The redo fusion technique is accurate and allows the optimization of X-ray working views, supporting the endovascular navigation and vessel catheterization in case of endovascular redo aortic repair.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference31 articles.

1. Impact of Hybrid Rooms with Image Fusion on Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Aortic Repair;Hertault;Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.,2014

2. Impact of Hybrid Operating Rooms on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair;Tinelli;J. Endovasc. Ther.,2021

3. Image Fusion During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair, to Fuse or Not to Fuse? A Meta-analysis and Additional Data From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort;Blankensteijn;J. Endovasc. Ther.,2021

4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2022, December 23). Implementation of the Principle of as Low as Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) for Medical and Dental Personnel. NCRP Report no. 107. Available online: http://www.ncrponline.org/Publications/Reports_100-119.html.

5. Feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging during thoracic endovascular aortic repair;Schulz;J. Vasc. Surg.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3