Revealing the Causes of Dyslexia through a Differential Diagnosis, a Short-Term Effective Treatment and an Appropriate Conceptual Framework

Author:

Werth Reinhard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Social Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Haydnstr. 5, D-80336 Munich, Germany

Abstract

Various different impairments and their interactions can cause reading problems referred to as “dyslexia”. Since reading requires the interaction of many abilities, the impairment of each of these abilities can result in dyslexia. Therefore, the diagnosis must differentiate various kinds of dyslexia. The diagnosis of a certain kind of dyslexia cannot be delimited to the investigation and description of symptoms but must also include the investigation of the causes of each kind of dyslexia. For this purpose, a scientifically unequivocal concept of causation and appropriate methods are needed to distinguish them from co-existing impairments that have no causal influence on reading performance. The results of applying these methods cannot be adequately accounted for by a non-scientific, intuitive understanding of necessary and sufficient conditions and causation. The methods suitable for revealing the causes of dyslexia are described in detail, and the results of applying these methods in experiments, in which 356 children with developmental dyslexia participated, are reviewed. Since the concepts of “necessary” and “sufficient” conditions and “causation” proposed in the philosophy of science are not suitable for describing causes of dyslexia and their interaction, they are replaced by a more detailed, experimentally based conceptual framework that provides an accurate description of the conditions required for correct reading and the causes of dyslexia.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference146 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-5), American Psychiatric Association. [5th ed.].

2. Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study;Shaywitz;JAMA,1990

3. Incidence of reading disability in a population-based birth cohort, 1976–1982;Katusic;Min. Mayo Clin. Proc.,2001

4. Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies;Rutter;J. Am. Med. Ass.,2004

5. Bos, W., Tarelli, I., Bremerich-Vos, A., and Schwippert, K.K. (2012). Lesekompetenzen im internationalen Vergleich. IGLU 2011. Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich, Waxmann.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3