Affiliation:
1. IRIS—Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux, USPN EHESS CNRS INSERM, 93300 Aubervilliers, France
2. BioSilicium, France & Université Paris Cité, CNRS, 75012 Paris, France
Abstract
Diagnoses in forensic science cover many disciplinary and technical fields, including thanatology and clinical forensic medicine, as well as all the disciplines mobilized by these two major poles: criminalistics, ballistics, anthropology, entomology, genetics, etc. A diagnosis covers three major interrelated concepts: a categorization of pathologies (the diagnosis); a space of signs or symptoms; and the operation that makes it possible to match a set of signs to a category (the diagnostic approach). The generalization of digitization in all sectors of activity—including forensic science, the acculturation of our societies to data and digital devices, and the development of computing, storage, and data analysis capacities—constitutes a favorable context for the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). AI can intervene in the three terms of diagnosis: in the space of pathological categories, in the space of signs, and finally in the operation of matching between the two spaces. Its intervention can take several forms: it can improve the performance (accuracy, reliability, robustness, speed, etc.) of the diagnostic approach, better define or separate known diagnostic categories, or better associate known signs. But it can also bring new elements, beyond the mere improvement of performance: AI takes advantage of any data (data here extending the concept of symptoms and classic signs, coming either from the five senses of the human observer, amplified or not by technical means, or from complementary examination tools, such as imaging). Through its ability to associate varied and large-volume data sources, but also its ability to uncover unsuspected associations, AI may redefine diagnostic categories, use new signs, and implement new diagnostic approaches. We present in this article how AI is already mobilized in forensic science, according to an approach that focuses primarily on improving current techniques. We also look at the issues related to its generalization, the obstacles to its development and adoption, and the risks related to the use of AI in forensic diagnostics.
Reference43 articles.
1. Balogh, E.P., Miller, B.T., and Ball, J.R. (2023, July 07). The Diagnostic Process, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338593/.
2. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual DSM 5, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
3. World Health Organization (WHO) (2019). International Classification of Diseases ICD-11.
4. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine;Shortliffe;Math. Biosci.,1975
5. (2023, July 07). What Is Machine Learning (ML)? Datascience@berkeley, the Online Master of Information and Data Science from UC Berkeley. Available online: https://ischoolonline.berkeley.edu/blog/what-is-machine-learning/.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Inteligencia artificial en las ciencias forenses: el futuro ya está aquí;Revista Española de Medicina Legal;2024-07
2. Illuminating Evidence;Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics;2024-06-30