Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:15
Volume:14
Page:1643
-
ISSN:2075-4418
-
Container-title:Diagnostics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diagnostics
Author:
Olivetta Michelangelo1, Manfredi Celeste2ORCID, Spirito Lorenzo2ORCID, Quattrone Carmelo2, Bottone Francesco2, Stizzo Marco2, Amicuzi Ugo3, Lecce Arturo2, Rubinacci Andrea2, Romano Lorenzo2, Della Rosa Giampiero2, Papi Salvatore2, Tammaro Simone2, Coppola Paola2, Arcaniolo Davide2ORCID, Fusco Ferdinando3, De Sio Marco2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology, AOU San Giovanni e Ruggi D’Aragona, G. Fucito Hospital, 84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy 2. Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy 3. Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Abstract
(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-naïve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score ≥ 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.
Reference26 articles.
1. Cornford, P., van den Bergh, R.C., Briers, E., Broeck, T.V.D., Brunckhorst, O., Darraugh, J., Eberli, D., De Meerleer, G., De Santis, M., and Farolfi, A. (Eur. Urol., 2024). EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent, Eur. Urol., Epub ahead of print. 2. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2;Turkbey;Eur. Urol.,2019 3. Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation;Schoots;BJU Int.,2021 4. Active surveillance for prostate cancer;Shill;Transl. Androl. Urol.,2021 5. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer;Drost;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2019
|
|