Digital Transformation in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Acceptability of Blended Learning

Author:

Weimer Andreas Michael1,Berthold Rainer2,Schamberger Christian1,Vieth Thomas3,Balser Gerd3,Berthold Svenja4,Stein Stephan1,Müller Lukas5,Merkel Daniel6,Recker Florian7,Schmidmaier Gerhard1,Rink Maximilian8,Künzel Julian8ORCID,Kloeckner Roman9ORCID,Weimer Johannes3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany

2. Group Practice of Physicians Spilburg Wetzlar, Department of Orthopedics, 35578 Wetzlar, Germany

3. Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

4. Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany

5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

6. BIKUS—Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany

7. Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany

8. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

9. Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Lübeck, 23538 Luebeck, Germany

Abstract

Background: ultrasound diagnostics have a broad spectrum of applications, including among diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Accordingly, it is important for the users to have a well-founded and up-to-date education in this dynamic examination method. The right balance between online and in-class teaching still needs to be explored in this context. Certifying institutions are currently testing digitally transformed teaching concepts to provide more evidence. Methods: this study compared two musculoskeletal ultrasound blended learning models. Model A was more traditional, with a focus on in-person teaching, while Model B was more digitally oriented with compulsory webinar. Both used e-learning for preparation. Participants completed evaluations using a seven-point Likert scale, later converted to a 0–1 scale. Digital teaching media (e-learning) were used for preparation in both courses. Results: the analysis included n = 41 evaluations for Model A and n = 30 for Model B. Model B received a better overall assessment (median: 0.73 vs. 0.69, p = 0.05). Model B also excelled in “course preparation” (p = 0.02), “webinar quality” (p = 0.04), and “course concept” (p = 0.04). The “gain of competence” (p = 0.82), “learning materials” (p = 0.30), and “tutor quality” (p = 0.28) showed no significant differences. Conclusion: participants favorably assessed blended learning in ultrasound teaching. Certifying institutions should consider accrediting models that combine digital methods (e.g., internet lectures/webinars) and materials (e.g., e-learning) with hands-on ultrasound training. Further research is needed to validate these subjective findings for a stronger evidential basis.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference52 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3