Role of Ensemble Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Classification in Multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequence Data
-
Published:2023-01-28
Issue:3
Volume:13
Page:481
-
ISSN:2075-4418
-
Container-title:Diagnostics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diagnostics
Author:
Tandel Gopal S.1ORCID, Tiwari Ashish2, Kakde Omprakash G.3ORCID, Gupta Neha4, Saba Luca5, Suri Jasjit S.6
Affiliation:
1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Sehore 466114, India 2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440010, India 3. Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur 441108, India 4. IT Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India 5. Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy 6. Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
Abstract
The biopsy is a gold standard method for tumor grading. However, due to its invasive nature, it has sometimes proved fatal for brain tumor patients. As a result, a non-invasive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool is required. Recently, many magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based CAD tools have been proposed for brain tumor grading. The MRI has several sequences, which can express tumor structure in different ways. However, a suitable MRI sequence for brain tumor classification is not yet known. The most common brain tumor is ‘glioma’, which is the most fatal form. Therefore, in the proposed study, to maximize the classification ability between low-grade versus high-grade glioma, three datasets were designed comprising three MRI sequences: T1-Weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Further, five well-established convolutional neural networks, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50 were adopted for tumor classification. An ensemble algorithm was proposed using the majority vote of above five deep learning (DL) models to produce more consistent and improved results than any individual model. Five-fold cross validation (K5-CV) protocol was adopted for training and testing. For the proposed ensembled classifier with K5-CV, the highest test accuracies of 98.88 ± 0.63%, 97.98 ± 0.86%, and 94.75 ± 0.61% were achieved for FLAIR, T2W, and T1W-MRI data, respectively. FLAIR-MRI data was found to be most significant for brain tumor classification, where it showed a 4.17% and 0.91% improvement in accuracy against the T1W-MRI and T2W-MRI sequence data, respectively. The proposed ensembled algorithm (MajVot) showed significant improvements in the average accuracy of three datasets of 3.60%, 2.84%, 1.64%, 4.27%, and 1.14%, respectively, against AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50.
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry
Reference123 articles.
1. (2022, November 17). Cancer Statistics. Available online: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/brain-tumor/statistics. 2. Tandel, G.S., Biswas, M., Kakde, O.G., Tiwari, A., Suri, H.S., Turk, M., Laird, J.R., Asare, C.K., Ankrah, A.A., and Khanna, N.N. (2019). A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification. Cancers, 11. 3. Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications of the 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system;Gritsch;Cancer,2022 4. Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images;Pereira;IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging,2016 5. Xie, Y., Zaccagna, F., Rundo, L., Testa, C., Agati, R., Lodi, R., Manners, D.N., and Tonon, C. (2022). Convolutional Neural Network Techniques for Brain Tumor Classification (from 2015 to 2022): Review, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics, 12.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|