Changing Laboratory Practice for Early Detection of a Fetal Inflammatory Response: A Contemporary Approach

Abstract

Neonates born with the fetal inflammatory response (FIR) are at risk of complications such as early-onset neonatal sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Providing an early histopathological diagnosis of FIR is important to guide management but can be a challenge in busy laboratories. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study over a four-month duration recruiting all placental cases with histological chorioamnionitis in our institution. The diagnostic performance of the umbilical cord (UC) section in identifying FIR, relative to the corresponding subsequent placental sections, was assessed. Clinical predictors of umbilical cord FIR were also investigated. A total of 390 UC sections were analyzed, of which 206 (52.8%) were found positive for FIR: 111 cases (53.9%) stage 1, 87 (42.2%) stage 2, and 8 (3.9%) stage 3. Our data revealed a good diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 76.2% (95%CI: 68.6–82.7%), 82.4% (95%CI: 65.5–93.2%), 95.0% (95%CI: 90.2–97.6%), and 77.3% (95%CI: 70.6–83.1%) respectively, in cases when clinical chorioamnionitis, fever and/or prolonged rupture of membrane (PROM) were suspected, with the area under the curve of 0.793. A maternal inflammatory response (MIR) was correlated with FIR (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the higher the gestational age, clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis, fever, and/or PROM, and the higher the stage of MIR significantly increased the odds of FIR (p < 0.001). UC section diagnosis of FIR is reasonably accurate in cases with clinical chorioamnionitis, fever, and/or PROM. Changing current laboratory practice to rapid processing of UC ahead of the rest of the other placental sections can be recommended in busy pathology departments.