Influencing Factors Regarding the Severity of Peri-Implantitis and Peri-Implant Mucositis

Author:

Benedek Csilla1,Kerekes-Máthé Bernadette2ORCID,Bereșescu Liana3ORCID,Buka Imola Zsuzsa1,Bardocz-Veres Zsuzsanna4ORCID,Geréb Ildikó5,Mártha Krisztina Ildikó6,Jánosi Kinga Mária7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

2. Department of Tooth and Dental Arch Morphology, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

3. Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

4. Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

5. Windisch Dental-Wident, 1053 Budapest, Hungary

6. Department of Orthodontics, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

7. Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania

Abstract

The scientific literature is increasingly focused on peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, which are biological outcomes of dental implant treatment. Background/Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the two most critical complications of dental implantation, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, through the prism of different influencing factors. Methods: We followed 40 patients, with a total number of 92 dental implants, divided into three age groups: under 35 years, between 35 and 55 years, and older than 55 years. Patients were also divided into groups according to the time since implant placement: 1–3 years, 4–7 years, and more than 7 years. The patients were examined, and periodontal pocket depth, peri-implant pocket depth, Löe–Silness gingival index, mucosal thickness, and keratinized mucosal width were recorded; bone resorption was measured on radiographs using a 2D image analysis method; and a questionnaire was also conducted. Results: Bone resorption was highest in the 35–55 age group (3.09 ± 0.04 mm) and for implants placed 4–7 years ago (3.39 ± 0.12 mm). Females had a mean bone resorption of 3.4 ± 0.15 mm and males of 2.45 ± 0.07 mm. Statistically, there was a significant difference only in the Löe–Silness index: the 35–55 age group had the highest values (p = 0.04). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between the time since implant placement and the degree of bone resorption, nor between sexes. Peri-implant inflammation may occur at any age, regardless of the lifetime of the implants.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. Dental implants: The last 100 years;Block;J. Oral Maxillofac. Surgery,2018

2. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions;Buser;Periodontol. 2000,2017

3. Implant dentistry: A continuing evolution;Nervins;Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent.,2014

4. Realization of tissue care concept by the use of Denti bone level implants. Three years of clinical experience in applying Denti BL implants;Vajdovich;Fogorvosi Szle.,2012

5. Evaluation of implant success: A review of past and present concepts;Karthik;J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3