Characteristics of Rare Inherited Retinal Dystrophies in Adaptive Optics—A Study on 53 Eyes

Author:

Samelska Katarzyna12ORCID,Szaflik Jacek Paweł12ORCID,Guszkowska Maria2ORCID,Kurowska Anna Katarzyna12ORCID,Zaleska-Żmijewska Anna12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland

2. SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are genetic disorders that lead to the bilateral degeneration of the retina, causing irreversible vision loss. These conditions often manifest during the first and second decades of life, and their primary symptoms can be non-specific. Diagnostic processes encompass assessments of best-corrected visual acuity, fundoscopy, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, electrophysiological tests, and genetic testing. This study focuses on the application of adaptive optics (AO), a non-invasive retinal examination, for the assessment of patients with IRDs. AO facilitates the high-quality, detailed observation of retinal photoreceptor structures (cones and rods) and enables the quantitative analysis of parameters such as cone density (DM), cone spacing (SM), cone regularity (REG), and Voronoi analysis (N%6). AO examinations were conducted on eyes diagnosed with Stargardt disease (STGD, N=36), cone dystrophy (CD, N=9), and cone-rod dystrophy (CRD, N=8), and on healthy eyes (N=14). There were significant differences in the DM, SM, REG, and N%6 parameters between the healthy and IRD-affected eyes (p<0.001 for DM, SM, and REG; p=0.008 for N%6). The mean DM in the CD, CRD, and STGD groups was 8900.39/mm2, 9296.32/mm2, and 16,209.66/mm2, respectively, with a significant inter-group difference (p=0.006). The mean SM in the CD, CRD, and STGD groups was 12.37 μm, 14.82 μm, and 9.65 μm, respectively, with a significant difference observed between groups (p=0.002). However, no significant difference was found in REG and N%6 among the CD, CRD, and STGD groups. Significant differences were found in SM and DM between CD and STGD (p=0.014 for SM; p=0.003 for DM) and between CRD and STGD (p=0.027 for SM; p=0.003 for DM). Our findings suggest that AO holds significant potential as an impactful diagnostic tool for IRDs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3