Affiliation:
1. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20157 Milano, Italy
2. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy
3. Dipartimento di Informatica, Sistemistica e Comunicazione, University of Milano–Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
Abstract
Total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedures have steadily increased over the past few decades, and their use is expected to grow further, mainly due to an increasing number of elderly patients. Cost-containment strategies, supporting a rapid recovery with a positive functional outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and enhanced patient reported outcomes, are needed. A Fast Track surgical procedure (FT) is a coordinated perioperative approach aimed at expediting early mobilization and recovery following surgery and, accordingly, shortening the length of hospital stay (LOS), convalescence and costs. In this view, rapid rehabilitation surgery optimizes traditional rehabilitation methods by integrating evidence-based practices into the procedure. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of Fast Track versus Care-as-Usual surgical procedures and pathways (including rehabilitation) on a mid-term patient-reported outcome (PROs), the SF12 (with regard both to Physical and Mental Scores), 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, with the use of Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to address the issue of the comparability of the groups in a non-randomized study. We were interested in the evaluation of the entire pathways, including the postoperative rehabilitation stage, therefore, we only used early home discharge as a surrogate to differentiate between the Fast Track and Care-as-Usual rehabilitation pathways. Our study shows that the entire Fast Track pathway, which includes the post-operative rehabilitation stage, has a significantly positive impact on physical health-related status (SF12 Physical Scores), as perceived by patients 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, as opposed to the standardized program, both in terms of the PROs score and the relative improvements observed, as compared with the minimum clinically important difference. This result encourages additional research into the effects of Fast Track rehabilitation on the entire process of care for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, focusing only on patient-reported outcomes.
Funder
Italian Ministry of Health—Ricerca Corrente
Reference49 articles.
1. Improvement in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective multicentre study of 36,935 procedures from 2010 to 2017;Petersen;Sci. Rep.,2020
2. The results of a stepwise implementation of a fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement patients;Drosos;J. Orthop.,2020
3. Romano, L.U., Rigoni, M., Torri, E., Nella, M., Morandi, M., Casetti, P., and Nollo, G. (2021). A propensity score-matched analysis to assess the outcomes in pre-and post-fast-track hip and knee elective prosthesis patients. J. Clin. Med., 10.
4. Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial;Rocchi;Trials,2021
5. Conventional versus fast track rehabilitation after total hip replacement: A randomized controlled trial;Elmoghazy;J. Orthop. Trauma Rehabil.,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献