Abstract
In medical care, it is important to evaluate any new diagnostic test in the form of diagnostic accuracy studies. These new tests are compared to gold standard tests, where the performance of binary diagnostic tests is usually measured by sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp). However, these accuracy measures are often biased owing to selective verification of the patients, known as partial verification bias (PVB). Inverse probability bootstrap (IPB) sampling is a general method to correct sampling bias in model-based analysis and produces debiased data for analysis. However, its utility in PVB correction has not been investigated before. The objective of this study was to investigate IPB in the context of PVB correction under the missing-at-random assumption for binary diagnostic tests. IPB was adapted for PVB correction, and tested and compared with existing methods using simulated and clinical data sets. The results indicated that IPB is accurate for Sn and Sp estimation as it showed low bias. However, IPB was less precise than existing methods as indicated by the higher standard error (SE). Despite this issue, it is recommended to use IPB when subsequent analysis with full data analytic methods is expected. Further studies must be conducted to reduce the SE.
Funder
Research Creativity and Management Office
Reference48 articles.
1. Verification bias;BMJ Evid. Based Med.,2018
2. Umemneku Chikere, C.M., Wilson, K., Graziadio, S., Vale, L., and Allen, A.J. (2019). Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard–An update. PLoS ONE, 14.
3. Zhou, X.H., Obuchowski, N.A., and McClish, D.K. (2011). Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
4. Pepe, M.S. (2011). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction, Oxford University Press.
5. Verification bias-impact and methods for correction when assessing accuracy of diagnostic tests;Revstat Stat. J.,2014