Partial Verification Bias Correction Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling for Binary Diagnostic Tests

Author:

Arifin Wan NorORCID,Yusof Umi KalsomORCID

Abstract

In medical care, it is important to evaluate any new diagnostic test in the form of diagnostic accuracy studies. These new tests are compared to gold standard tests, where the performance of binary diagnostic tests is usually measured by sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp). However, these accuracy measures are often biased owing to selective verification of the patients, known as partial verification bias (PVB). Inverse probability bootstrap (IPB) sampling is a general method to correct sampling bias in model-based analysis and produces debiased data for analysis. However, its utility in PVB correction has not been investigated before. The objective of this study was to investigate IPB in the context of PVB correction under the missing-at-random assumption for binary diagnostic tests. IPB was adapted for PVB correction, and tested and compared with existing methods using simulated and clinical data sets. The results indicated that IPB is accurate for Sn and Sp estimation as it showed low bias. However, IPB was less precise than existing methods as indicated by the higher standard error (SE). Despite this issue, it is recommended to use IPB when subsequent analysis with full data analytic methods is expected. Further studies must be conducted to reduce the SE.

Funder

Research Creativity and Management Office

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference48 articles.

1. Verification bias;BMJ Evid. Based Med.,2018

2. Umemneku Chikere, C.M., Wilson, K., Graziadio, S., Vale, L., and Allen, A.J. (2019). Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard–An update. PLoS ONE, 14.

3. Zhou, X.H., Obuchowski, N.A., and McClish, D.K. (2011). Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].

4. Pepe, M.S. (2011). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction, Oxford University Press.

5. Verification bias-impact and methods for correction when assessing accuracy of diagnostic tests;Revstat Stat. J.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3