Abstract
Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. Study design: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. Results: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). Conclusion: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary.
Reference38 articles.
1. Palacios-Jaraquemada, J.M., Basanta, N., Fiorillo, A., Labrousse, C., and Martínez, M. Neonatal outcome after conservative-reconstructive surgery for placenta accreta spectrum disorders. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med., 2021.
2. Placenta Accreta Spectrum;Silver;N. Engl. J. Med.,2018
3. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP);Collins;Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.,2015
4. A study of placenta accreta;Irving;Surg. Gynec. Obstet.,1937
5. The effect of placental location in cases of placenta accreta spectrum;Morgan;Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,2019
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献