Hidden Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessment but Not Coronary Flow Reserve Helps to Explain the Slow Coronary Flow Phenomenon in Patients with Angiographically Normal Coronary Arteries

Abstract

The significance of the slow coronary flow phenomenon (SCFph), as visualized in patients (pts) with angiographically normal coronary arteries, is controversial. Absolute coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), non-invasively assessed by a transthoracic color-guided pulsed-wave Doppler (E-Doppler TTE), is a reliable parameter to assess coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD). Mild and angiographically hidden epicardial atherosclerosis (Hath), as visualized by intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS), which could be the clue to atherosclerotic coronary microvascular involvement, has never been investigated together with CFR in patients. This study was aimed at assessing the value of CFR and HA in explaining the SCFph. Methods. Both non-invasive assessment of CFR in the LAD and corrected TIMI frame count assessment of the coronary contrast runoff were performed in 124 pts with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Among the whole group, 32 patients also underwent intracoronary ultrasounds in the LMCA and LAD, and the maximal plaque burden was assessed (Lesion external elastic (EEM) cross sectional area (CSA)—Lesion Lumen CSA/Lesion EEM CSA * 100). We found that 24 of the 124 pts (group 1) had the SCFph and the remaining 100 had a normal runoff (group 2). CFR, evaluated in both groups, was not significantly different, being 2.79 ± 0.79 (Mean ± SD) in group 1 and 2.90 ± 0.8 in group 2 (p = ns); in the pts also examined by IVUS (32 pts), the SCFph was always associated with hidden atherosclerosis, and a plaque burden of ≥33%. On the contrary, in the normal runoff group, any grade of PB was observed (from no athero to a PB > 70%) and remarkably, 10 pts had no signs of athero or just a minimal plaque burden. This resulted in a ROC curve analysis in which PB < 33% had a high negative predictive value (100%) in ruling out the SCFph. In addition, considering a CFR value < 2.21 as an index of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction, we found CMD in 15 pts (15%) in group 1 and in 7 pts (29%) in group 2 (p = ns). In conclusion, the SCFph is strongly connected to epicardial athero to the extent that the absence of hidden coronary athero has a very high negative predictive power in ruling out SCFph. CFR that is based on an endothelium-independent mechanism remains fairly normal in this condition. An endothelium-dependent microcirculatory constriction at rest due to atherosclerotic involvement of the coronary microvascular network is a possible explanation of the SCFph.