Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Hydrosalpinx Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Delgado-Morell Aina12ORCID,Nieto-Tous Mar3,Andrada-Ripollés Cristina4,Pascual Maria Ángela5ORCID,Ajossa Silvia67,Guerriero Stefano67ORCID,Alcázar Juan Luis8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain

2. Institute of Biomedical Research Sant Pau (IIB SANT PAU), 08041 Barcelona, Spain

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 València, Spain

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, 12004 Castelló, Spain

5. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

6. Centro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Policlinico Duilio Casula, 09042 Monserrato, Italy

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, 09043 Monserrato, Italy

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain

Abstract

Hydrosalpinx is a condition with a crucial prognostic role in reproduction, and its diagnosis by a non-invasive technique such as ultrasound is key in achieving an adequate reproductive assessment while avoiding unnecessary laparoscopies. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthetize and report the current evidence on transvaginal sonography (TVS) accuracy to diagnose hydrosalpinx. Articles on the topic published between January 1990 and December 2022 were searched in five electronic databases. Data from the six selected studies, comprising 4144 adnexal masses in 3974 women, 118 of which were hydrosalpinxes, were analyzed as follows: overall, TVS had a pooled estimated sensitivity for hydrosalpinx of 84% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 76–89%), specificity of 99% (95% CI = 98–100%), positive likelihood ratio of 80.7 (95% CI = 33.7–193.0), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI = 0.11–0.25) and DOR of 496 (95% CI = 178–1381). The mean prevalence of hydrosalpinx was 4%. The quality of the studies and their risk of bias were assessed using QUADAS-2, evidencing an overall acceptable quality of the selected articles. We concluded that TVS has a good specificity and sensitivity for diagnosing hydrosalpinx.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3