Abstract
Hypovolemia may be underestimated due to compensatory mechanisms. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a flat inferior vena cava (IVC) on computed tomography (CT) for predicting the development of shock and mortality in trauma patients. Relevant studies were obtained by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (articles up to 16 September 2022). The number of 2-by-2 contingency tables for the index test were collected. We adopted the Bayesian bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model. Twelve studies comprising a total of 1706 patients were included. The flat IVC on CT showed 0.46 pooled sensitivity (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.32–0.63), 0.87 pooled specificity (95% CrI 0.78–0.94), and 0.78 pooled AUC (95% CrI 0.58–0.93) for the development of shock. The flat IVC for mortality showed 0.48 pooled sensitivity (95% CrI 0.21–0.94), 0.70 pooled specificity (95% CrI 0.47–0.88), and 0.60 pooled AUC (95% CrI 0.26–0.89). Regarding the development of shock, flat IVC provided acceptable accuracy with high specificity. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the flat IVC showed poor accuracy. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity in some included studies.
Reference35 articles.
1. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: Fourth edition;Crit. Care,2016
2. Major Causes of Preventable Death in Trauma Patients;J. Trauma Inj.,2021
3. Advanced Trauma Life Support® Update 2019: Management and Applications for Adults and Special Populations;Anesthesiol. Clin.,2019
4. Systematic reviews of scores and predictors to trigger activation of massive transfusion protocols;J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care,2019
5. Kim, D.-W., Chung, S., Kang, W.-S., and Kim, J. (2021). Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Respiratory Variation in the Inferior Vena Cava, Subclavian Vein, Internal Jugular Vein, and Femoral Vein Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics, 12.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献