Influence of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction on the Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Author:

Xie Zhixin123,Wu Tianlong23,Mu Jing123,Zhang Ping4,Wang Xuan25,Liang Tao25,Weng Yihan236,Luo Jianfang23,Yu Huimin237

Affiliation:

1. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China

2. Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China

3. Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, China

4. Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China

5. School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

6. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China

7. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital’s Nanhai Hospital, Foshan 528000, China

Abstract

Objectives: Our study aimed to demonstrate the influence of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction on the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR). Methods: One hundred vessels from 90 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent echocardiography, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), CT-FFR, invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and fractional flow reserve (FFR). The study population was divided into normal and dysfunction groups according to the LV diastolic function, and the diagnostic performance in both groups was assessed. Results: There was a good correlation between CT-FFR and FFR (R = 0.768 p < 0.001) on a per-vessel basis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82.3%, 81.8%, and 82%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.6%, 88.5%, and 87.2% in the normal group and 81%, 77.5%, and 78.7% in the dysfunction group, respectively. CT-FFR showed no statistically significant difference in the AUC in the normal group vs. the dysfunction group (AUC: 0.920 [95% CI 0.787–0.983] vs. 0.871 [95% CI 0.761–0.943], Z = 0.772 p = 0.440). However, there was still a good correlation between CT-FFR and FFR in the normal group (R = 0.767, p < 0.001) and dysfunction group (R = 0.767 p < 0.001). Conclusions: LV diastolic dysfunction had no effect on the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR. CT-FFR has good diagnostic performance in both LV diastolic dysfunction and the normal group and can be used as an effective tool for finding lesion-specific ischemia while screening for arterial disease in patients.

Funder

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

High-level Hospital Construction Project

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI);Bangalore;Eur. Heart J.,2014

2. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study;Pijls;J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,2010

3. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease;Pijls;N. Engl. J. Med.,2012

4. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study;Koo;J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,2011

5. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps);Leipsic;J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3