Oligomalt, a New Slowly Digestible Carbohydrate, Reduces Post-Prandial Glucose and Insulin Trajectories Compared to Maltodextrin across Different Population Characteristics: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials in Healthy Individuals, People with Obesity, and People with Type 2 Diabetes
-
Published:2024-07-26
Issue:8
Volume:14
Page:410
-
ISSN:2218-1989
-
Container-title:Metabolites
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Metabolites
Author:
Johansen Odd Erik1ORCID, Neutel Joel2, Gupta Sanjay3, Mariani Barbara3, Ufheil Gerhard34, Perrin Emilie5, Rytz Andreas6ORCID, Lahiry Anirban6, Delodder Frederik6, Lerea-Antes Jaclyn37, Ocampo Naomi7, von Eynatten Maximilian1
Affiliation:
1. Nestlé Health Science, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland 2. Orange County Research Center, Tustin, CA 92780, USA 3. Nestlé Product Technology Center NHS, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA 4. Nestlé Research and Development Konolfingen, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., 3510 Konolfingen, Switzerland 5. SOCAR Research SA, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland 6. Nestlé Research, Clinical Research Unit, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland 7. Nestlé Health Science, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA
Abstract
We assessed the glucometabolic effects of oligomalt, a novel fully slowly digestible carbohydrate, compared with maltodextrin, in cross-over randomized controlled trials (NCT05058144; NCT05963594) involving healthy volunteers (HV), people with overweight or obesity (PwO), and people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We tested 33 g and/or 50 g of oligomalt/maltodextrin, which were dissolved in 300 mL of water and consumed after fasting in the morning. The primary exploratory endpoint was the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for postprandial glucose, assessed by frequent blood sampling over 3 h. Insulin levels were also assessed. In the HV cohort, a 4 h hydrogen breath test was performed with 15 g of inulin as a positive control. Analysis was performed by a mixed model. Oligomalt elicited a lower post-prandial glucose response compared to maltodextrin in HV (50 g, n = 15 [7 women], mean age/BMI 31 years/22.6 kg/m2), in PwO (33 g and 50 g, n = 26 [10 women], age/BMI 44 years/29.9 kg/m2, mean HbA1c 5.3%), and in people with T2D (50 g, n = 22 [13 women], age/BMI 61 years/31.8 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.4%), with significant reductions observed in PwO and T2D for the 0–1 h window (HV: −19% [p = 0.149]/PwO33g-38% [p = 0.0002]/PwO50g-28% [p = 0.0027]/T2D-38% [p < 0.0001]; the 0–2 h window (HV: −17% [p = 0.311]/PwO33g-34% [p = 0.0057]/PwO50g-21% [p = 0.0415]/T2D-37% [p < 0.0001]), and the 0–3 h window (HV: −15% [p = 0.386]/PwO33g-30% [p = 0.0213]/PwO50g0−19% [p = 0.0686]/T2D−37% [p = 0.0001]). The post-prandial insulin response was significantly lower, by 38–60%, across all populations, dose, and time points, with oligomalt. In HV, the breath-hydrogen pattern was comparable between oligomalt and maltodextrin, but increased significantly with inulin. These data support the glucometabolic advantages of oligomalt over maltodextrin, hence confirming it as a healthier carbohydrate, and underscoring its full digestibility. This therefore opens up the possibility for the incorporation of oligomalt in relevant food products/matrices.
Funder
Nestlé Health Science
Reference46 articles.
1. U.S (2024, June 01). Food and Drug Administration. Interactive Nutrition Facts Label, October 2021, Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/interactivenutritionfactslabel/assets/InteractiveNFL_TotalCarbohydrate_October2021.pdf. 2. U.S (2024, June 01). Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, Available online: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans-2020-2025.pdf. 3. Guidelines for daily carbohydrate intake: Do athletes achieve them?;Burke;Sports Med.,2001 4. WHO (2024, June 01). Sugars Factsheet. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/librariesprovider2/euro-health-topics/obesity/sugars-factsheet.pdf?sfvrsn=d5b89d5f_3&download=true. 5. Ross, A.C. (2020). Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, Jones & Bartlett Learning.
|
|