Affiliation:
1. Army Scientific and Technological Research Center—CICTE, Department of Life Science and Agriculture, Universidad de Las Fuerzas Armadas—ESPE, Av. General Rumiñahui s/n y, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador
2. Developmental Biology Department, Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independenţei, 060031 Bucharest, Romania
Abstract
The Musa spp. represents the most commonly produced, transitioned, and consumed fruit around the globe, with several important applications in the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Moko disease is produced by Ralstonia solanacearum—a factor with a high impact on all crops in Ecuador, representing one of the biggest phytosanitary problems. Four of the most common varieties of Musa spp. were tested to identify the metabolic reaction of plants facing Moko disease. The phenolic and flavonoid content has been evaluated as a defense system, and the α-diphenyl-α-picrylhydrazyl free-radical-scavenging method (DPPH), free-radical-scavenging activity (ABTS), ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS) have been adapted to analyze the active compounds with the antioxidant capacity necessary to counteract the pathogenic attack. Our results indicate that all the studied varieties of Musa spp. react in the same way, such that the diseased samples showed a higher accumulation of secondary metabolites with antioxidant capacity compared with the healthy ones, with high active compound synthesis identified during the appearance of Moko disease symptoms. More than 40 compounds and their derivatives (from kaempferol and quercetin glycosides) with protective roles demonstrate the implication of the Musa spp. defense system against R. solanacearum infection.
Funder
Universidad de Las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE
Institute of Biology Bucharest, Romanian Academy
Reference66 articles.
1. (2023, June 15). International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Available online: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/105424?show=full.
2. FAO (2022). Banana Market Review—Preliminary Results 2022, FAO.
3. Siddiq, M., Ahmed, J., and Lobo, M.G. (2020). Handbook of Banana Production, Postharvest Science, Processing Technology, and Nutrition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [1st ed.].
4. Bacterial Diseases of Bananas and Enset: Current State of Knowledge and Integrated Approaches Toward Sustainable Management;Blomme;Front. Plant Sci.,2017
5. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology;Mansfield;Mol. Plant Pathol.,2012