Abstract
This paper investigates consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for click-and-collect grocery services. In particular, we analyze whether the time-pressed are willing to pay higher fees. We exploit a survey among 572 customers of two Belgian supermarket chains—both users and non-users. We test our model for three (increasingly narrow) samples: all respondents, respondents with a non-zero WTP, and current users. Our key finding relates to the latter sample. Surprisingly, if we use the WTP measure put forward in the literature, the answer to our research question is ‘no’: we find no significant relationship between users’ perceived time pressure and the maximum service cost per order they are willing to pay. However, on closer scrutiny this ‘no’ in fact means ‘yes’: our finding implies that in the face of increasing fees the time-pressed are willing to maintain their current, higher order frequency for as long as the other users. The maximum total cost they are willing to incur over a given period is thus higher. This said, the absence of a relationship between time pressure and the WTP per order does limit the opportunities for e-grocers to price discriminate, as is suggested in the literature. A further complication is that we find no clear pattern between perceived time pressure and the use of specific time slots.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference114 articles.
1. The reception box impact on home delivery efficiency in the e‐grocery business
2. Last mile fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel grocery retailing: a strategic planning framework
3. To pay or not to pay, that is the question. Conceptual model and empirical results on consumers’ view on home delivery;Kotzab,2005
4. Kaufland Exiting Online Channelhttps://retailanalysis.igd.com/markets/europe/news/news-article/t/kaufland-exiting-online-channel/i/18085
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献