Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Otakaari 4, 02150 Espoo, Finland
Abstract
Power system transformation can unleash wide-ranging effects across multiple, frequently interlinked dimensions such as the environment, economy, resource systems, and biodiversity. Consequently, assessing the multidimensional impacts of power system transformation, especially under rapid transitions, has become increasingly important. Nonetheless, there is a gap in the literature when it comes to applying such an analysis to a Mediterranean country facing structural socioeconomic challenges. This paper explores the potential multifaceted implications of rapidly decarbonizing the Greek power sector by 2035, focusing on the local-level consequences. The evaluation criteria encompass the cost-optimal power mix, power costs, land use, biomass utilization, GDP, and employment. In this effort, a technology-rich cost optimization model representing Greece’s power sector is linked to a global Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) macroeconomic model focusing on the Greek economy. The results indicate that a fast decarbonization of the Greek power sector could trigger positive socioeconomic consequences in the short- and medium-term (GDP: +1.70, employees: +59,000 in 2030), although it may induce negative long-term socioeconomic effects due to increased capital investment requirements. Additionally, the impact on land use may only be trivial, with the potential to decrease over time due to the de-escalation of biomass power generation, thereby reducing the risk of harming biodiversity.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference66 articles.
1. The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration;Steffen;Anthr. Rev.,2015
2. Current and future threats to human health in the Anthropocene;Tong;Environ. Int.,2022
3. Popescu, C.R.G., and González, A.L. (2022). Frameworks for Sustainable Development Goals to Manage Economic, Social, and Environmental Shocks and Disasters, IGI Global.
4. Centralized vs. Distributed Energy Storage—Benefits for Residential Users;Zakeri;Energy,2021
5. Gitelman, L., and Kozhevnikov, M. (2022). Energy Transition Manifesto: A Contribution towards the Discourse on the Specifics Amid Energy Crisis. Energies, 15.