Bitcoin and Its Energy, Environmental, and Social Impacts: An Assessment of Key Research Needs in the Mining Sector

Author:

Rudd Murray A.1ORCID,Bratcher Lee2,Collins Simon3,Branscum David4,Carson Matthew5,Connell Shaun6,David Elliot7,Gronowska Magdalena8,Hess Sebastien9,Mitchell Austin10,Prusak Matt11ORCID,Schneps Kyle12,Serezhin Maxim13,Wolfe Scott A.14,Porter Dennis1

Affiliation:

1. Satoshi Action Education, Portland, OR 97214, USA

2. Texas Blockchain Council, Richardson, TX 75081, USA

3. Stackr Limited, Otautahi 9610, New Zealand

4. Rebel Mining Company, Jackson, WY 83001, USA

5. Hash House Tech, Wilmington, DE 19808, USA

6. Lancium Technologies Corp, The Woodlands, TX 77380, USA

7. Sustainable Bitcoin Protocol, Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971, USA

8. PRTI Inc., Franklinton, NC 27525, USA

9. Block Green AG, 6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland

10. Synota Inc., Columbus, OH 43219, USA

11. US Bitcoin Corp, Austin, TX 78741, USA

12. Foundry Digital LLC., Pittsford, NY 14534, USA

13. Standard Power, Coshocton, OH 43812, USA

14. Bitcoin Coalition of Canada, Toronto, ON M6H 3P2, Canada

Abstract

In this study, we used a combination of AI-assisted analysis of social media discourse and collaboration with industry experts to delve into the key research needs associated with the Bitcoin mining industry. We identified primary threats, opportunities, and research questions related to the Bitcoin mining industry and its wider impacts, focusing on its energy use and environmental footprint. Our findings spotlight the industry’s move towards increasingly greater energy efficiency and an emerging commitment to renewable energy, highlighting its potential to contribute to the coming energy transition. We underscore the transformative potential of emerging applications in the Bitcoin mining sector, especially regarding demand response, grid flexibility, and methane mitigation. We suggest that targeted research on Bitcoin can serve policymakers, private sector decision-makers, research funding agencies, environmental scientists, and the Bitcoin industry itself. We propose that filling key information gaps could help clarify the risks and benefits of Bitcoin mining by encouraging collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders and conducting research that provides baseline peer-reviewed evidence surrounding Bitcoin’s production and impacts. A collaborative approach could help mitigate the risks and realize the benefits of Bitcoin mining, including potentially positive and substantive contributions in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Funder

Satoshi Action Education

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference91 articles.

1. Nakamodo, S. (2023, November 12). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available online: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

2. Consolvo, B., and Caron, K. (2023). Bitcoin’s Role in the ESG Imperative, KPMG LLP. Available online: https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2023/bitcoin-role-esg-imperative.html.

3. Bitcoin’s growing energy problem;Joule,2018

4. Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2 °C;Mora;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2018

5. The carbon footprint of bitcoin;Stoll;Joule,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3