The Mitochondrial Biomarkers FGF-21 and GDF-15 in Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine

Abstract

Mitochondrial processes may play a role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Serum levels of two biomarkers, Fibroblast-growth-factor 21 (FGF-21) and Growth-differentiation-factor 15 (GDF-15), are typically elevated in patients with mitochondrial disorders. The study investigated whether the presence of migraine may influence FGF-21 and GDF-15 serum levels considering vascular and metabolic disorders as possible confounders. A cross-sectional study in two headache centers was conducted analyzing GDF-15 and FGF-21 serum concentration in 230 patients with episodic and chronic migraine compared to a control group. Key clinical features of headache were evaluated, as well as health-related life quality, anxiety and depression using SF-12 and HADS-questionnaires. Elevated GDF-15 values were detected in the migraine group compared to the control group (506.65 ± 275.87 pg/mL vs. 403.34 ± 173.29 pg/mL, p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test). A strong correlation between increasing age and higher GDF-15 levels was identified (p < 0.001, 95%-CI elevation of GDF-15 per year 5.246–10.850 pg/mL, multiple linear regression). Mean age was different between the groups, and this represents a confounding factor of the measurements. FGF-21 levels did not differ between migraine patients and controls (p = 0.635, Mann–Whitney U test) but were significantly influenced by increasing BMI (p = 0.030, multiple linear regression). Neither biomarker showed correlation with headache frequency. Higher FGF-21 levels were associated with a higher mean intensity of headache attacks, reduced health-related life quality and anxiety. When confounding factors were considered, increased serum levels of FGF-21 and GDF-15 were not detected in migraine patients. However, the results show an age-dependence of GDF-15 in migraine patients, and this should be considered in future studies. Similar findings apply to the relationship between FGF-21 and BMI. Previous studies that did not adjust for these factors should be interpreted with caution.