Affiliation:
1. Department of Prosthodontics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112 Halle, Germany
Abstract
Even in digital workflows, models are required for fitting during the fabrication of dental prostheses. This study examined the influence of different parameters on the dimensional accuracy of three-dimensionally printed models. A stereolithographic data record was generated from a master model (SOLL). With digital light processing (DLP) and stereolithography (SLA) printing systems, 126 models were produced in several printing runs—SolFlex350 (S) (DLP, n = 24), CaraPrint 4.0 (C) (DLP, n = 48) and Form2 (F) (SLA, n = 54)—and their accuracy was compared with plaster and milled polyurethane models. In addition to the positioning on the build platform, a distinction was made between parallel and across arrangement of the models to the printer’s front, solid and hollow models, and printing with and without support structures. For accuracy assessment, five measurement sections were defined on the model (A–E) and measured using a calibrated digital calliper and digital scans in combination with the GOM Inspect Professional software 2021. The mean deviation between the measurement methods for all distances was 79 µm. The mean deviation of the models from the digital SOLL model were 207.1 µm for the S series, 25.1 µm for the C series and 141.8 µm for the F series. While positioning did not have an influence, there were clinically relevant differences mainly regarding the choice of printer, but also individually in alignment, model structure and support structures.
Reference70 articles.
1. Etemad-Shahidi, Y., Qallandar, O.B., Evenden, J., Alifui-Segbaya, F., and Ahmed, K.E. (2020). Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med., 9.
2. 3D Printing in Dentistry;Dawood;Br. Dent. J.,2015
3. Accuracy of Five Different 3D Printing Workflows for Dental Models Comparing Industrial and Dental Desktop Printers;Berrendero;Clin. Oral Investig.,2022
4. A Validation Study of Reconstructed Rapid Prototyping Models Produced by Two Technologies;Dietrich;Angle Orthod.,2017
5. Accuracy of Printed Dental Models Made with 2 Prototype Technologies and Different Designs of Model Bases;Camardella;Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.,2017