Integrated Energy Systems Modeling with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement for Identifying a Sustainable Energy Transition

Author:

Davidsdottir Brynhildur1,Ásgeirsson Eyjólfur Ingi2ORCID,Fazeli Reza3ORCID,Gunnarsdottir Ingunn4,Leaver Jonathan5ORCID,Shafiei Ehsan6,Stefánsson Hlynur2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Engineering & Natural Sciences, Environment & Natural Resources, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland

2. School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland

3. School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

4. Landsvirkjun—The National Power Company of Iceland, 105 Reykjavik, Iceland

5. School of Building Construction and Engineering, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

6. RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, 413 27 Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a decision support system (DSS) to capture the complexity of the transition of a national energy system to net zero in the context of multiple sustainability themes. The paper proposes an integrated assessment framework that combines dynamic systems modeling, sustainability indicators, and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) with direct stakeholder involvement. To illustrate the use of the DSS, the paper compares bundles of climate change policies that aim to decarbonize the road transport sector in Iceland. Eighteen scenarios and alternative development trajectories are defined for the Icelandic energy system based on a combination of three main driving forces. These are, firstly, economic development (three cases); secondly, changes in energy efficiency (two cases); and finally, three climate policy bundles aimed at increasing the share of electric vehicles. Based on the results from the integrated assessment framework, the performance scores of the climate policy bundles are compared across the following five sustainability themes: social impact; economic development; environmental impact; energy security; and technical aspects. The findings confirm that a different conclusion may be reached when multiple sustainability themes are applied in the selection of preferred policy bundles as compared to conventional techno-economic criteria. Banning the registration of fossil-fueled vehicles, combined with economic instruments, offers the best decarbonizing strategy to reach climate and energy policy goals simultaneously.

Funder

Icelandic Centre for Research

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference73 articles.

1. (2015). United Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris Agreement, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

2. Lee, H., and Romero, J. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.

3. United Nations Environment Programme (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record—Temperatures Hit New Highs, Yet World Fails to Cut Emissions (Again), UNEP.

4. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C;Rogelj;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2015

5. International Atomic Energy Agency and International Energy Agency (IAEA/IEA) (2001). Indicators for Sustainable Energy Development: Report presented at the Ninth Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development, IAEA/IEA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3