Comparison of Mid-Term Outcomes between Microhook ab Interno Trabeculotomy and Goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade

Author:

Okada NaokiORCID,Hirooka Kazuyuki,Onoe HiromitsuORCID,Okumichi HideakiORCID,Kiuchi YoshiakiORCID

Abstract

This study retrospectively examined the mid-term surgical outcomes between microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (μLOT) and goniotomy when one was using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) in combination with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliation glaucoma patients. Between December 2016 and December 2020, the current study examined 47 μLOT and 52 KDB eyes that underwent surgery. When there was a < 20% reduction in the preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) or when the IOP was > 18 mmHg (criterion A), the IOP was > 14 mmHg (criterion B) at two consecutive follow-up visits, or when there was a requirement for reoperation, these were all considered to indicate that the surgery failed. A genetic algorithm that used the preoperative IOP was used to determine the score matching. After score matching, a total of 27 eyes were evaluated. In the μLOT and KDB groups, the mean postoperative follow-up periods were 31.2 ± 13.3 and 37.2 ± 16.3 months, respectively. The results for both of the groups show there were significant postoperative reductions in the IOP (p < 0.05) and medication scores (p < 0.05) at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. At 12, 24, and 36 months, the probabilities of success in the μLOT and KDB groups for criterion A were 70.4% and 48.2%, 61.9% and 48.2%, and 55.0% and 48.2% (p = 0.32; log-rank test), respectively. For criterion B, the results for the two groups were 55.6% and 33.3%, 44.4% and 33.3%, and 44.4% and 33.3% (p = 0.15; log-rank test), respectively. Similar postoperative complications were found between the groups. Comparable mid-term surgical outcomes were found for the uses of μLOT and KDB.

Funder

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3