Sustainable Agriculture Management: Environmental, Economic and Social Conjunctures for Coffee Sector in Guerrero, via Traditional Knowledge Management
-
Published:2024-08-09
Issue:16
Volume:16
Page:6864
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Contreras-Medina David Israel1ORCID, Contreras-Medina Luis Miguel2ORCID, Cerroblanco-Vázquez Verónica3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Arte y Empresa, División de Ingenierías Campus Irapuato-Salamanca DICIS, Universidad de Guanajuato, Carr. Salamanca-Valle de Santiago km 3.5 + 1.8, Comunidad de Palo Blanco, Salamanca 36885, Mexico 2. Facultad de Ingeniería, División de Investigación y Posgrado, CA Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas s/n, km 1, Amazcala 76265, Mexico 3. Doctorado en Gestión Tecnológica e Innovación, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Mexico
Abstract
Early studies on sustainability establish social, economic, and environmental improvement as the ultimate goal worldwide. This is true for nations or companies with significant economic and technological resources that apply indicators, data, and methodologies to manage harmonious, sustainable development; however, little is known about the management, integration, and measurement of unified social, economic, and environmental dimensions to achieve sustainable actions for agriculture. Therefore, under a qualitative-quantitative approach combining the knowledge management paradigm, sustainability criteria, and the log-linear statistical test, this paper investigates actions for sustainability around planting–harvesting–first disposal of the coffee circuit based on the tacit-explicit traditional knowledge of 55 members of its productive ecosystem from Guerrero, Mexico. The results show a statistical integration between environmental, economic, and social data with 0.000 (p < 0.05); a partial association on its effects with 0.209, 0.068, and 0.000, respectively (p > 0.05); the creation of on-site banks, training and assistance, and a state network for exchanging experiences as the conjectural actions that can show effects with 0.002, while the remaining were over >0.05 (p > 0.05). Governments, organizations, and researchers could extrapolate the model for sustainable agriculture management in the coffee-growing regions and for other crops.
Funder
National Council of Humanities, Sciences, and Technologies
Reference106 articles.
1. Indicators and Their Use. Information for Decision-Making;Redclift;Sustainability. Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences,2005 2. Quiroga Martinez, R., and United Nations (2001). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Environment and Human Settlements Division. Indicadores de Sostenibilidad Ambiental y de Desarrollo Sostenible: Estado Del Arte y Perspectivas, CEPAL, Divisioón de Medio Ambiente y Asentamientos Humanos. 3. World Bank (2023, December 10). Lograr El Desarrollo Sostenible de Modo Incluyente y Eficiente. Available online: https://blogs.worldbank.org/es/voices/lograr-el-desarrollo-sostenible-de-modo-incluyente-y-eficiente. 4. (2024, January 22). CEPAL Acerca de Desarrollo Sostenible. Available online: https://www.cepal.org/es/temas/desarrollo-sostenible/acerca-desarrollo-sostenible. 5. (2024, January 21). PNUD ¿Qué Son Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible?. Available online: https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals.
|
|