Methodological Framework for Integrating Cultural Impact in Sustainability Assessments of Cultural Events

Author:

Biedermann Anna Maria1ORCID,Muñoz López Natalia1ORCID,Santolaya Sáenz José Luis1ORCID,Asión-Suñer Laura1ORCID,Galán Pérez Francisco Javier2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza—Campus Río Ebro, C/María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain

2. PU of Fine Arts, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences Teruel, University of Zaragoza, 44003 Teruel, Spain

Abstract

Based on the three dimensions model of sustainability, different studies that address the integration of the culture and sustainability concepts from a theoretical field propose that culture should be included as another sustainability dimension to a greater degree. This approach has not been put into practice to date. In fact, when sustainability application is examined in cultural activities such as museums and exhibitions, in most cases it is associated with only one dimension and evaluation methodologies based on a holistic approach; the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is used in very few cases. In this work, a methodological framework is proposed to add the cultural dimension to the study of the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability. A sequence of phases in line with the LCSA methodology is used to achieve the simultaneous evaluation of impacts associated with a sustainability approach based on four dimensions. A thorough literature review revealed cultural indicators, which were classified and organized in order to facilitate the cultural impact assessment and complement the indicators already used to evaluate other dimensions. Additionally, the approaches and methods proposed are put into practice in a case study, which consists of an experimental exhibition room. The different phases of the methodology have been successively developed, and indicators for all sustainability dimensions have been obtained. Thus, the theoretical contribution of this work is embellished with the development of a practical case, which demonstrate that cultural dimensions can be evaluated together with the rest of the dimensions in order to obtain a multidimensional assessment of sustainability.

Funder

Government of Aragon

Universidad de Zaragoza

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference80 articles.

1. Engström, G., Gars, J., Jaakkola, N., Lindahl, T., Spiro, D., and van Benthem, A.A. (2002). Informe de la Cumbre Mundial sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible. Environmental and Resource Economics, Naciones Unidas.

2. World commission on environment and development;WCED;Our Common Future,1987

3. Mancebo, F., and Sachs, I. (2015). Transitions to Sustainability. Transitions to Sustainability, Springer.

4. What is sustainability?;Kuhlman;Sustainability,2010

5. (2024, January 15). UNESCO. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/unesco-universal-declaration-cultural-diversity.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3