The Town Crier: A Use-Case Design and Implementation for a Socially Assistive Robot in Retirement Homes
Author:
Iglesias Ana1ORCID, Viciana Raquel2ORCID, Pérez-Lorenzo José Manuel2ORCID, Ting Karine Lan Hing3ORCID, Tudela Alberto4ORCID, Marfil Rebeca4ORCID, Qbilat Malak1ORCID, Hurtado Antonio1, Jerez Antonio4ORCID, Bandera Juan Pedro4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Computer Science and Engineering Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain 2. Telecommunication Engineering Department, University of Jaén, 23700 Jaén, Spain 3. Living Lab ActivAgeing/LIST3N, Technological University of Troyes, 10004 Troyes, France 4. Department of Electronic Technology, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
Abstract
The use of new assistive technologies in general, and Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) in particular, is becoming increasingly common for supporting people’s health and well-being. However, it still faces many issues regarding long-term adherence, acceptability and utility. Most of these issues are due to design processes that insufficiently take into account the needs, preferences and values of intended users. Other issues are related to the currently very limited amount of long-term evaluations, performed in real-world settings, for SARs. This study presents the results of two regional projects that consider as a starting hypothesis that the assessment in controlled environments and/or with short exposures may not be enough in the design of an SAR deployed in a retirement home and the necessity of designing for and with users. Thus, the proposed methodology has focused on use-cases definitions that follow a human-centred and participatory design approach. The main goals have been facilitating system acceptance and attachment by involving stakeholders in the robots design and evaluation, overcoming usage barriers and considering user’s needs integration. The implementation of the first use-case deployed and the two-phase pilot test performed in a retirement home are presented. In particular, a detailed description of the interface redesign process based on improving a basic prototype with users’ feedback and recommendations is presented, together with the main results of a formal evaluation that has highlighted the impact of changes and improvements addressed in the first redesign loop of the system.
Reference40 articles.
1. Servicio de Difusión y Publicaciones del Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía (2012). Proyección de Población de Andalucía por Ámbitos Subregionales 2009–2035, Junta de Andalucía. 2. Feil-Seifer, D., and Mataric, M. (July, January 28). Defining Socially Assistive Robotics. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE C9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Li, Y., Liang, N., Effati, M., and Nejat, G. (2022). Dances with Social Robots: A Pilot Study at Long-Term Care. Robotics, 11. 4. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care;Abdi;BMJ Open,2018 5. Anghel, I., Cioara, T., Moldovan, D., Antal, M., Pop, C.D., Salomie, I., Pop, C.B., and Chifu, V.R. (2020). Smart Environments and Social Robots for Age-Friendly Integrated Care Services. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|