Hofmann vs. Paracelsus: Do Psychedelics Defy the Basics of Toxicology?—A Systematic Review of the Main Ergolamines, Simple Tryptamines, and Phenylethylamines

Author:

Henríquez-Hernández Luis12ORCID,Rojas-Hernández Jaime23,Quintana-Hernández Domingo24ORCID,Borkel Lucas2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Toxicology, Clinical Science Department, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Paseo Blas Cabrera Felipe s/n, CP 35016 Canary Islands, Spain

2. Asociación Científica Psicodélica, CP 35300 Canary Islands, Spain

3. Asociación Canaria para el Desarrollo de la Salud a través de la Atención, CP 35007 Canary Islands, Spain

4. Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Atlántico Medio, CP 35017 Canary Islands, Spain

Abstract

Psychedelics are experiencing a strong renaissance and will soon be incorporated into clinical practice. However, there is uncertainty about how much harm they can cause at what doses. This review aimed to collect information on the health-hazardous doses of psychedelic substances, to be aware of the risks to which patients may be subjected. We focused on ergolamines, simple tryptamines, and phenylethylamines. We reviewed articles published in major medical and scientific databases. Studies reporting toxic or lethal doses in humans and animals were included. We followed PRISMA criteria for revisions. We identified 3032 manuscripts for inclusion. Of these, 33 were ultimately useful and gave relevant information about effects associated with high psychedelics doses. Despite having different molecular structures and different mechanisms of action, psychedelics are effective at very low doses, are not addictive, and are harmful at extremely high doses. For LSD and psilocybin, no dose has been established above which the lives of users are endangered. In contrast, MDMA appears to be the most dangerous substance, although reports are biased by recreational missuses. It seems that it is not only the dose that makes the poison. In the case of psychedelics, the set and setting make the poison.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Chemical Health and Safety,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology

Reference83 articles.

1. WHO (2022, December 09). Depression, Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression.

2. SAMHSA (2022). Response to Task Force.

3. Escohotado, A. (1998). Historia de las Drogas, Alianza Editorial.

4. Luzardo, O.P., Almeida-González, M., Zumbado, M., Ruíz-Suárez, N., Henríquez-Hernández, L.A., and Boada, L.D. (2022, November 09). Manual Docente de Toxicología Veterinaria [Manual docente] 2012, Available online: https://spdc.ulpgc.es/libro/manual-docente-de-toxicologia-veterinaria_50717/.

5. Di Nunno, N., Esposito, M., Argo, A., Salerno, M., and Sessa, F. (2021). Pharmacogenetics and Forensic Toxicology: A New Step towards a Multidisciplinary Approach. Toxics, 9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3