Comparison of the Sliding Resistance of Metallic, Composite and In-House 3D-Printed Brackets: An In Vitro Study

Author:

Brucculeri Luca1,Pellitteri Federica1ORCID,Palone Mario1ORCID,Lombardo Luca1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the differences in frictional resistance between in-house 3D-printed resin brackets (IH3DBs) and two types of commercially available brackets in combination with three different archwires. Methods: Friction tests were performed using a dynamometer and a millimetre sled to simulate first premolar post-extraction space closure. Three different brackets, namely PRIMO metallic brackets, Crystal composite brackets and in-house 3D-printed brackets, were tested in combination with three different archwires (0.016-inch NiTi, 0.019 × 0.025-inch NiTi and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS). Statistical analysis was performed to verify the differences in friction among the bracket and archwire combinations. For all the tests, the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant differences among the three brackets tested with both the 0.016-inch NiTi and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS archwires (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017, respectively). Only tests with the 0.019 × 0.025-inch NiTi archwire yielded no statistically significant differences between the groups. The composite bracket generated clinically and statistically more friction than both the IH3DB and metallic bracket, with no differences between the latter two. Conclusions: The IH3DBs demonstrated comparable frictional resistance properties to the metal brackets and better than the composite brackets with all the archwires tested.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference40 articles.

1. Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment—A questionnaire study;Eur. J. Orthod.,2010

2. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances;Rosvall;Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.,2009

3. JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures part 1: Results and trends;Gottlieb;J. Clin. Orthod.,1996

4. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets;Russell;J. Orthod.,2005

5. Aslan, B.I., and Uzuner, F.D. (2019). Current Approaches in Orthodontics, IntechOpen. [1st ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3