NIODA and the Problem of Evil: God as Ultimate Determiner

Author:

Sánchez-Cañizares Javier1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. “Mind-Brain Group” at the Institute for Culture and Society (ICS) and “Science, Reason and Faith” Group (CRYF), University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

Abstract

The problem of evil permeates contemporary theodicy, raising the question of how an omnipotent and benevolent God can allow its existence. Exploring this inquiry is inherently tied to investigating divine action, specifically the interplay between time and eternity within a temporary creation. In recent decades, the Non-Interventionist Objective Divine Action (NIODA) project has endeavored to present a science-backed perspective that acknowledges a respectful divine action harmonizing with the workings of nature. However, this viewpoint has faced criticism from various angles, particularly for its perceived inability to provide a definitive response to the problem of evil. This contribution aims to overcome these criticisms. While not necessarily endorsing the NIODA proposal, it seeks to present a fresh outlook on the question of evil that aligns with NIODA, addressing the dichotomy between the unity and plurality of divine action in the world and offering novel insights for the Christian doctrine of creation.

Funder

Institute for Culture and Society

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference26 articles.

1. The Government of Evil Machines: An Application of Romano Guardini’s Thought on Technology;Beltramini;Scientia et Fides,2021

2. Understanding Decoherence as an Irreversible Process;Fortin;International Journal of Quantum Foundations,2018

3. The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics;Kochen;Indiana University Mathematics Journal,1967

4. Meister, Chad (2009). Introducing Philosophy of Religion, Routledge.

5. Murphy, Nancey C., and Ellis, George Francis Rayner (1996). On the Moral Nature of the Universe: Theology, Cosmology, and Ethics. Theology and the Sciences, Fortress Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Genealogy of Reductionism, Why Shortcuts Don’t Pay Off;New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3