Affiliation:
1. Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Praha, Czech Republic
2. Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Abstract
Over a period of 30 years (1993–2022), headwater catchments in the Slavkov Forest (Czech Republic) exhibited a robust increase in stream water DOC (dissolved organic carbon) concentrations following a significant reduction in acidic atmospheric deposition. Sulfur deposition decreased from 34 kg ha−1 yr−1 in 1993 to 2.6 kg ha−1 yr−1 in 2022. Three Norway-spruce-dominated research sites—Černý Potok (CEP), a 15.2 ha peatbog catchment, Lysina (LYS), a 27.3 ha granitic catchment, and Pluhův Bor (PLB), a 21.6 ha serpentinite catchment, were investigated. The three–year average DOC concentration increased from 48.2 mg L−1 (1993–1995) to 68.3 mg L−1 (2020–2022) at CEP (0.69 mg L−1 yr−1). LYS showed an increase from 16.9 mg L−1 to 25.4 mg L−1 (0.30 mg L−1 yr−1 annually). The largest increase was recorded at PLB, with an increase from 15.7 mg L−1 to 36.7 mg L−1 (0.89 mg L−1 yr−1). A decline in ionic strength was identified as the main driver of the DOC increase. The annual runoff declined significantly at CEP and LYS from 465 mm to 331 mm as a result of rising air temperatures and reduced precipitation between 2014 and 2022. PLB (average of 266 mm) did not show a statistically significant decline. Recently, PLB experienced significant deforestation that likely lowered transpiration and thus increased catchment runoff. As a result, DOC fluxes did not change significantly at CEP (average 210 kg ha−1 yr−1) and LYS (90 kg ha −1 yr−1). However, PLB’s DOC flux more than doubled, increasing from 44 to 106 kg ha−1 yr−1. Drivers connected with global change, such as increasing temperatures, or potential chemical drivers, such as reductions in Al concentrations and pH changes, were not able to explain the observed changes in DOC concentra tions and fluxes.
Reference35 articles.
1. Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry;Monteith;Nature,2007
2. Trends in surface water chemistry in acidified areas in Europe and North America from 1990 to 2008;Garmo;Water Air Soil Pollut.,2014
3. Garmo, Ø.A., Kaste, O., Arle, J., Austnes, K., de Wit, H., Fölster, J., Houle, D., Hruška, J., Indriksone, I., and Monteith, D.T. (2023, October 05). Trends and Patterns in Surface Water Chemistry in Europeand North America between 1990 and 2016, with Particular Focus on Changes in Land Use as a Confounding Factor for Recovery. ICP Waters Report, 142/2020. NIVA Report SNO 7479-2020. Available online: http://www.icp-waters.no/2020/03/16/2020-report-trends-and-patterns-in-surface-water-chemistry/.
4. Ongoing increases in dissolved organic carbon are sustained by decreases in ionic strength rather than decreased acidity in waters recovering from acidic deposition;Lawrence;Sci. Total Environ.,2021
5. Cleaner air reveals growing influence of climate on dissolved organic carbon trend;Stoddard;Environ. Res. Lett.,2021