Towards Managing Uncertain Geo-Information for Drilling Disasters Using Event Tracking Sensitivity Analysis
Author:
Tavakoli Siamak1, Poslad Stefan2, Fruhwirth Rudolf3, Winter Martin4, Zeiner Herwig4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Computer Science Department, Maharishi International University, Fairfield, IA 52557, USA 2. School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK 3. Thonhauser Data Engineering GmbH, 8700 Leoben, Austria 4. JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, 8010 Graz, Austria
Abstract
In sub-surface drilling rigs, one key critical crisis is unwanted influx into the borehole as a result of increasing the influx rate while drilling deeper into a high-pressure gas formation. Although established risk assessments in drilling rigs provide a high degree of protection, uncertainty arises due to the behavior of the formation being drilled into, which may cause crucial situations at the rig. To overcome such uncertainties, real-time sensor measurements are used to predict, and thus prevent, such crises. In addition, new understandings of the effective events were derived from raw data. In order to avoid the computational overhead of input feature analysis that hinders time-critical prediction, EventTracker sensitivity analysis, an incremental method that can support dimensionality reduction, was applied to real-world data from 1600 features per each of the 4 wells as input and 6 time series per each of the 4 wells as output. The resulting significant input series were then introduced to two classification methods: Random Forest Classifier and Neural Networks. Performance of the EventTracker method was understood correlated with a conventional manual method that incorporated expert knowledge. More importantly, the outcome of a Neural Network Classifier was improved by reducing the number of inputs according to the results of the EventTracker feature selection. Most important of all, the generation of results of the EventTracker method took fractions of milliseconds that left plenty of time before the next bunch of data samples.
Funder
EU FP7 funded project TRIDEC IlluMINEation project
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference44 articles.
1. Jandl, B., Winter, M., Fruhwirth, R., Riedel, F., and Zeiner, H. (2012, January 22–27). Rig Side Online Drilling Support System for Prediction and Prevention of Upcoming Crises. Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2012, Vienna, Austria. EGU2012-9363-1. 2. Coppes, J., and Rudd, N.E. (1976, January 8–9). Blowout Prevention is Mistake Prevention. Proceedings of the SPE European Spring Meeting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Christman, S., Kelly, A., Plaisance, M., Kropla, S., Metcalf, J., Robinson, E., and Weddle, C. (1999, January 9–11). An Overview of the IADC Deepwater Well Control Guidelines. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Nunes, J.O.L., Bannwart, A.C., and Ribeiro, P.R. (2002, January 8–11). Mathematical Modeling of Gas Kicks in Deep Water Scenario. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia. 5. Freithofnig, H.J., Spoerker, H.F., and Thonhauser, G. (2003, January 20–22). Analysis of Hook Load Data to Optimize Ream and Wash Operations. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
|
|