Comparative Morpho-Physiological, Biochemical, and Gene Expressional Analyses Uncover Mechanisms of Waterlogging Tolerance in Two Soybean Introgression Lines
Author:
Sharmin Ripa Akter12ORCID, Karikari Benjamin34ORCID, Bhuiyan Mashiur Rahman1, Kong Keke1, Yu Zheping15, Zhang Chunting1, Zhao Tuanjie1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China 2. Department of Botany, Jagannath University, Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh 3. Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale P.O. Box TL 1882, Ghana 4. Département de Phytologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada 5. Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
Abstract
Waterlogging is one of the key abiotic factors that severely impedes the growth and productivity of soybeans on a global scale. To develop soybean cultivars that are tolerant to waterlogging, it is a prerequisite to unravel the mechanisms governing soybean responses to waterlogging. Hence, we explored the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes in two contrasting soybean introgression lines, A192 (waterlogging tolerant, WT) and A186 (waterlogging sensitive, WS), under waterlogging. In comparison to the WT line, waterlogging drastically decreased the root length (RL), shoot length (ShL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (ShFW), root dry weight (RDW), and shoot dry weight (ShDW) of the WS line. Similarly, waterlogging inhibited soybean plant growth by suppressing the plant’s photosynthetic capacity, enhancing oxidative damage from reactive oxygen species, and decreasing the chlorophyll content in the WS line but not in the WT line. To counteract the oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation, the WT line exhibited increased activity of antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), as well as higher levels of proline content than the WS line. In addition, the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes (POD1, POD2, FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, CAT1, and CAT2) and ethylene-related genes (such as ACO1, ACO2, ACS1, and ACS2) were found to be up-regulated in WT line under waterlogging stress conditions. In contrast, these genes showed a down-regulation in their expression levels in the stressed WS line. The integration of morpho-physiological, biochemical, and gene expression analyses provide a comprehensive understanding of the responses of WT and WS lines to waterlogging conditions. These findings would be beneficial for the future development of soybean cultivars that can withstand waterlogging.
Funder
National Key R&D Program of China National Natural Science Foundation of China Core Technology Development for Breeding Program of Jiangsu Province Program of Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production
Reference55 articles.
1. Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean genotypes through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms;Garcia;Environ. Exp. Bot.,2020 2. Andjelkovic, V. (2018). Plant, Abiotic Stress Responses Climate Change, Intech Open. 3. Water logging effects on growth and yield components in late planted soybean;Linkemer;Crop Sci.,1998 4. A quantitative review of soybean responses to waterlogging: Agronomical, morphophysiological and anatomical traits of tolerance;Ploschuk;Plant Soil,2022 5. Adegoye, G.A., Olorunwa, O.J., Alsajri, F.A., Walne, C.H., Wijewandana, C., Kethireddy, S.R., Reddy, K.N., and Reddy, K.R. (2023). Waterlogging Effects on Soybean Physiology and Hyperspectral Reflectance during the Reproductive Stage. Agriculture, 13.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|