Affiliation:
1. College of Food Science and Technology, Whole Grain Food Engineering Research Center, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology/Key Laboratory for Control Technology and Standard for Agro-Product Safety and Quality, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Key Laboratory for Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Abstract
In recent years, quinoa, as a nutritious and sustainable food material, has gained increasing popularity worldwide. To investigate the diversity of nutritional characteristics among different quinoa cultivars and explore their potential health benefits, metabolites of five quinoa cultivars (QL-1, SJ-1, SJ-2, KL-1 and KL-2) were compared by non-targeted metabolomics analysis based on UPLC-ZenoTOF-MS/MS in this study. A total of 248 metabolites across 13 categories were identified. Although the metabolite compositions were generally similar among the different quinoa cultivars, significant variations existed in their respective metabolite contents. Among the identified metabolites, amino acids/peptides, nucleosides, saponins and phenolic acids were the most abundant. Notably, SJ-1 exhibited the most distinct metabolite profile when compared to the other cultivars. Amino acids/peptides and nucleosides were found to be crucial factors contributing to the unique metabolite profile of SJ-1. Collectively, these aforementioned metabolites accounted for a substantial 60% of the total metabolites observed in each quinoa variety. Additionally, a correlation between the DPPH radical scavenging activity and the free phenolic content of quinoa was observed. Variations in phenolic content resulted in different antioxidant capacities among the quinoa cultivars, and SJ-1 exhibited lower phenolic levels and weaker antioxidant activity than the others. These results can provide important information for the development of quinoa resources.
Funder
Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology
National Special Project for Agro-product Safety Risk Evaluation of China
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Reference43 articles.
1. Recent trends in design of healthier plant-based alternatives: Nutritional profile, gastrointestinal digestion, and consumer perception;Sridhar;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2022
2. New perspectives on physiological, biochemical and bioactive components during germination of edible seeds: A review;Liu;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2022
3. Ceylan, R., Zengin, G., Mahomoodally, M.F., Sinan, K.I., Ak, G., Jugreet, S., Cakir, O., Ouelbani, R., Paksoy, M.Y., and Yilmaz, M.A. (2021). Enzyme inhibition and antioxidant functionality of eleven Inula species based on chemical components and chemometric insights. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 95.
4. A comprehensive LC-MS/MS method validation for the quantitative investigation of 37 fingerprint phytochemicals in Achillea species: A detailed examination of A. coarctata and A. monocephala;Yilmaz;J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.,2018
5. Nutrient composition, functional activity and industrial applications of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.);Ren;Food Chem.,2023
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献