Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Theology and Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Poljanska 4, SI 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Abstract
The paper explores the concept of epistemic theodicy and strengthens an argument that reconciles human fallibility with the existence of an all-powerful and benevolent God. This argument is grounded in epistemic responsibility, emphasizing our epistemic autonomy. The paper supports two aspects of this argument: the role of epistemic agency in shaping beliefs and belief formation based on experiential rationality. The paper begins by introducing the concept of epistemic theodicy and its relation to the problem of epistemic evil. Next, it presents a succinct version of the argument based on epistemic responsibility. The paper then focuses on epistemic agency, proposing a notion rooted in reasons-responsiveness and highlighting the agentive nature of belief formation. It provides an outline a of view of epistemic rationality grounded in experiential rationality, showing its compatibility with the responsibility-based response to the problem of epistemic evil. The conclusion reflects on the significance of these accounts of agency and rationality in the context of epistemic theodicy.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Reference19 articles.
1. Epistemic Virtues and Interreligious Dialogue: A Case for Humility;Centa;Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia,2020
2. Descartes, René (2008). Meditations on First Philosophy. With Selections from the Objections and Replies, Oxford University Press.
3. Epistemic presuppositions and their consequences;Eflin;Metaphilosophy,2003
4. Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford University Press.
5. Core and Ancillary Epistemic Virtues;Horgan;Acta Analytica,2018