Impacts of Flight Operations on the Risk of Runway Excursions

Author:

Wang Feiyin1,Yuan Jintong1ORCID,Liu Xiaochen1,Wang Pengtao2,Xu Mao3,Li Xiaoyu3,Li Hang1

Affiliation:

1. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

2. College of Mining Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China

3. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

The Quick Access Recorder (QAR), as an onboard device used for monitoring and recording flight parameters, has been extensively installed on various types of aircraft. Recently, there has been a significant focus on studying the typical flight safety event of runway excursions based on QAR data. However, there is limited research that combines the analysis of runway excursion risks with flight operations, and there is also a scarcity of studies that divide the investigation of the landing phase into multiple key stages. In this paper, we propose a comparative analysis of operational characteristics and risks associated with runway excursions from the perspective of operational styles. A total of 2087 flights were classified on the basis of touchdown distance, taxiing distance, and magnetic heading changes and were divided into three styles based on these indicators. Subsequently, we analyze flight operations and attitudes at five key stages: runway threshold, flare, speed brake deployment, touchdown, and reverse thrust activation. Furthermore, we employ the selection criteria of pilot proficiency levels to filter out standard operational curves. The curve similarity is used to compare the difference between the actual operating curves and the standard curves. Finally, we employ typical correlation analysis to explore the relationship between touchdown distance and operational variances. The findings indicate that Style 1 pilots exhibit the lowest probability of runway excursions, yet their maneuvers potentially elevate the risk of hard landing events.

Funder

Scientific Research Program of the Tianjin Education Commission

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference37 articles.

1. IATA (2022). IATA Safety Report 2021, IATA.

2. IATA (2023). IATA Annual Safety Report-2022, IATA.

3. Airbus, S.A.S. (2023, November 19). A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958–2022. Available online: https://accidentstats.airbus.com.

4. Assessment of runway excursion causal factors and mitigation strategies;Okafor;Niger. J. Technol.,2018

5. Human risk factors associated with pilots in runway excursions;Chang;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3