Social Representations of “Tinnitus” and “Health” among Individuals with Tinnitus Seeking Online Psychological Interventions

Author:

Manchaiah Vinaya12345ORCID,Chundu Srikanth6,Ratinaud Pierre7,Andersson Gerhard8910,Beukes Eldre W.36ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

2. UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

3. Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative Initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

4. Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa

5. Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India

6. Vision and Hearing Sciences Research Group, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK

7. Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales (LERASS), University of Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France

8. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden

9. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden

10. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

(1) Objective: Social representations theory (SRT) is a body of theory within social psychology concerned with how individuals, groups, and communities collectively make sense of socially relevant or problematic issues, ideas, and practices. SRT has been increasingly sued in the area of health and disability. The current study examined the social representations of “tinnitus” and “health” among individuals with tinnitus who are seeking online psychological interventions. (2) Materials/Method: The data were gathered using a free association task about their “tinnitus” and “health” from 399 individuals with tinnitus. The data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative analyses methods. (3) Results: The responses resulted in 39 and 30 categories respectively, for “tinnitus” and “health”. The most commonly occurring categories for tinnitus included: descriptions of tinnitus (18%), annoying (13.5%), persistent (8%), and distracting (5%). The most commonly occurring categories for health included: content (12%), conditions (8%), active (7%), take control (6%), and overweight (5%). The responses to tinnitus had predominantly negative connotations (i.e., 76.9%) whereas a larger proportion of responses toward their health was related to positive connotations (i.e., 46.4%). These frequently occurring items were also dominant in similarities analysis. Prototypical analysis of tinnitus responses identified categories horrible and bothersome to be key items in the central zone. The categories in central zone of health responses included: content, active, healthy, grateful, and overweight. (4) Conclusions: Individuals with tinnitus have very negative view of their tinnitus impacting their psychological status. Tinnitus management should focus on reducing the negative associations toward their tinnitus and strengthen the positive aspects related to their general health.

Funder

National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders (NIDCD) of the National Institute of Health

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Podiatry,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference41 articles.

1. Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among US adults;Shargorodsky;Am. J. Med.,2010

2. Tinnitus;Baguley;Lancet,2013

3. Exploring tinnitus heterogeneity;Beukes;Prog. Brain Res.,2021

4. Investigating tinnitus subgroups based on hearing-related difficulties;Beukes;Int. J. Clin. Pract.,2021

5. Baguley, D.M., and Fagelson, M. (2016). Tinnitus: Clinical and Research Perspectives, Plural Publishing Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3