Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios

Author:

Hernández-Báez Álvaro1,Torres Esperanza Susana2ORCID,Amaya-Gómez Rafael1ORCID,Pradilla Diego1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia

2. School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, UK

Abstract

Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. In this regard, different approaches have been proposed for pipelines, but few studies are focused on oil transportation. This paper presents a methodology for performing QRA for onshore oil pipelines, which is based on the calculation of individual and societal risk indicators. This methodology is illustrated using an authentic case study of a segment of 17.53 km of the length of an onshore oil pipeline located in the southwest of Colombia, considering jet and pool fire scenarios. The results show that the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) for operation (and maintenance) and administrative workers are 6.14 × 10−4 and 8.52 × 10−5 yr−1, respectively. The IRPA for people close to the pipeline is between 2.31 × 10−4 and 2.60 × 10−4 yr−1. The IRPA for workers is tolerable, while for people may be classified as unacceptable. The societal risk was represented using the F–N curve, indicating that risk is unacceptable and nearby populations could be relocated.

Funder

CEIBA Foundation 2020 Master’s Scholarship and the Government of Nariño, Colombia

Administrative Department of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Colombia

National Hydrocarbon Agency

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Process Chemistry and Technology,Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous),Bioengineering

Reference40 articles.

1. The Use of Risk Criteria in Comparing Transportation Alternatives;Boot;Chem. Eng. Trans.,2013

2. Assessing the Consequences of Pipeline Accidents to Support Land-Use Planning;Carbone;Saf. Sci.,2017

3. Most Fatal Oil & Gas Pipeline Accidents through History: A Lessons Learned Approach;Biezma;Eng. Fail. Anal.,2020

4. Statistical Analysis of Environmental Consequences of Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Accidents;Belvederesi;Heliyon,2018

5. Goodfellow, G.D., Lyons, C.J., and Haswell, J.V. (2022, May 03). UKOPA Pipeline Product Loss Incidents and Faults Report. Available online: https://www.ukopa.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/UKOPA-Product-Loss-Incidents-Faults-Report-1962-2019-1.0-July-2021.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3