Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, Greece
2. School of Business, University of Nicosia, P.O. Box 24005, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus
3. Knowledge Management, Innovation and Strategy Center (KISC), University of Nicosia, P.O. Box 24005, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus
Abstract
This study explores the evolving theoretical divide within the field of International Political Economy (IPE), focusing on the debate between the advocates of new globalization and critics from the anti-globalization perspective. By conducting an integrative review of the contemporary literature, we explore the foundational theories, core components, and primary theorists of both perspectives, aiming to understand their predictions for future global dynamics. The investigation reveals a polarization in theoretical orientation, reflecting divergent views on the implications of globalization. Through a critical analysis, the paper identifies the liberal international order and the respective contemporary neo-Marxist viewpoints as central to the debate, evaluating their critiques and contributions to understanding the new globalization’s trajectory. We suggest a synthesis of these perspectives, positing that the future of globalization—or “new globalization”—will be influenced by structural changes in global power dynamics, ongoing crises, and technological progress. This is encapsulated in the “evolutionary structural triptych” (EST) approach, which perceives the world economy as an evolutionary result of political, economic, and technological structures, which correspondingly reposition the objectives of stability, growth, and innovation in the new emerging era. In conclusion, we advocate for a balanced approach to globalization, emphasizing the need for policies that promote fairness, sustainability, and cooperation in the changing global environment. This leads to the re-introduction of an appealing concept for globalization’s future: a new, realistic, open, and innovative global liberalism.
Reference105 articles.
1. Russo-Ukrainian War and the Emerging New Globalization: A Critical Review of Relevant Research;Vlados;Jpn. Political Econ.,2024
2. Michalet, C.A. (2005). Qu’est-ce que la Mondialisation?: Petit Traité à L’usage de Ceux et Celles qui ne pas Encore s’il Faut être Pour ou Contre [What Is Globalization? A Short Treatise for Those Who Are Not Yet Sure Whether to Be for or Against It], La Découverte. La Découverte Poche/Essais.
3. Strohmer, M.F., Easton, S., Eisenhut, M., Epstein, E., Kromoser, R., Peterson, E.R., and Rizzon, E. (2020). Introduction. Disruptive Procurement: Winning in a Digital World, Springer International Publishing.
4. Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, W.W Norton & Company.
5. Ghemawat, P. (2016). Laws of Globalization and Business Applications. Cambridge Univ Press.